Gamebird
Well-Known Member
OK so it's Thursday (my 'stuck in the office' afternoon) and I've been giving H&H's article some deliberation. I found it very interesting and quite realistic. If proven 3/4* jockeys can't make a living from eventing then what will happen to all the youngsters who have given up school/uni/other careers to pursue their dream?
I know that there are a few people on this forum who have taken, or are condering taking, the first step towards eventing for a living and I'm not aiming any of these comments at any of you (or anyone else!), merely laying out some thoughts and opening up a discussion.
How many aspirant young riders are covering their costs, let alone earning a wage? I would suspect that one or two of those who have European medals etc. may be doing so but I suspect that there are an awful lot being heavily subsidised by the bank of Mum and Dad.
With sponsorship deals mostly comprising equipment these days rather than providing hard cash I think that it must be very hard to find real money out there. It's all very well having a 'hat sponsor' but realistically how many hats does one jockey need and how large a part of the overall running costs does that represent. I probably replace my hat every 3-4 years (or obviously after a bad fall
) at an approximate cost of £100. That's only £25-33 per season - if someone stepped in and covered this cost for me it wouldn't really change where I stand financially. Admittedly a whole-yard feed sponsorship deal WOULD make something of a difference...... However there are only so many feed companies out there and most of them only want to be associated with one top rider from each discipline, leaving the rest to pick amongst the crumbs.
I think that people like Oli Townend, Angus Smales et al will always make it work. They are out there competing 5 horses most days of the week from March to October. They play the numbers game and if there is a profit to be made they will take it every time. They may have made unpopular moves to get where they are but they no-one could accuse any of them of being short of determination or ambition.
However with riders of the calibre of Louisa Brassey and Briony Whitttington unable to make a wage from the sport where does that leave everyone else?
To those of you with owners/sponsors/professional ambitions I would be interested to know how the sums work out. Do you know exactly your income/costs/profit breakdown and how much you 'pay' youself per hour? I get the impression from the article that those who are surviving do exactly this. To the rest of you how long will you give yourselves to 'make it' (and what would constitute your definition of 'making it'?) and until that time are you reliant on finance from a family member etc. to subsidise your sport?
Please don't take any of this controversially or personally. I am genuinely interested (and as I mentioned, rather bored) and trying to start a reasoned discussion!
I know that there are a few people on this forum who have taken, or are condering taking, the first step towards eventing for a living and I'm not aiming any of these comments at any of you (or anyone else!), merely laying out some thoughts and opening up a discussion.
How many aspirant young riders are covering their costs, let alone earning a wage? I would suspect that one or two of those who have European medals etc. may be doing so but I suspect that there are an awful lot being heavily subsidised by the bank of Mum and Dad.
With sponsorship deals mostly comprising equipment these days rather than providing hard cash I think that it must be very hard to find real money out there. It's all very well having a 'hat sponsor' but realistically how many hats does one jockey need and how large a part of the overall running costs does that represent. I probably replace my hat every 3-4 years (or obviously after a bad fall
I think that people like Oli Townend, Angus Smales et al will always make it work. They are out there competing 5 horses most days of the week from March to October. They play the numbers game and if there is a profit to be made they will take it every time. They may have made unpopular moves to get where they are but they no-one could accuse any of them of being short of determination or ambition.
However with riders of the calibre of Louisa Brassey and Briony Whitttington unable to make a wage from the sport where does that leave everyone else?
To those of you with owners/sponsors/professional ambitions I would be interested to know how the sums work out. Do you know exactly your income/costs/profit breakdown and how much you 'pay' youself per hour? I get the impression from the article that those who are surviving do exactly this. To the rest of you how long will you give yourselves to 'make it' (and what would constitute your definition of 'making it'?) and until that time are you reliant on finance from a family member etc. to subsidise your sport?
Please don't take any of this controversially or personally. I am genuinely interested (and as I mentioned, rather bored) and trying to start a reasoned discussion!