Rully
Active Member
I bought a horse in August this year, had her 5 stage vetted bloods taken etc and all fine. I intended to keep her as a long term project to compete in county showing next year. I ended up selling her last month as my groom gave her notice and my help with riding has had to give up due to a medical issue. The horse was a allrounder. I sold her to a lady who said she was very experienced, she tried the horse in the school, open field, we hacked along a busy road, quiet lane passing different traffic etc. I showed her the advert I bought the horse from. She did not have the horse vetted. We both signed a receipt stating 'sold as seen'.
2 weeks after buying her I received a call saying she had been difficult to hack out that day, spooking, jogging etc. I gave her some advice (she hadn't been using the same tack ie martingale) as me, she said she was going to put her on a herbal mare supplement; I also gave her the number of someone who lived in the same village who could help get her going and she could use her school. I also passed on the old owners phone number (and a copy of the ad I bought the horse from) in case she could help. All seemed ok. Then 4 days later the buyer called me again threatening me court action! Since that ride she hadn't ridden the mare out, she rode her in the field and said she was putting her head up and evading so she gave up. She now says that the mare is dangerous, unsafe to be ridden and will be pts! That she has bolted (tho apparently 'jumping forward 3 feet is bolting'), reared (but not upright on her back legs she has bounced) etc She claims she is not fit for purpose, she was screeching down the phone at me that she has taken legal advice and quoting 'the sale of goods act 1979''. I refused to take the horse back over the phone as said she was absolutely fine and asked her to write to me.
I have written her a formal letter detailing the above and also have witnesses who have ridden the horse just prior to her purchase (including someone who tried the horse). I have absolutely no reason to believe the horse wasn't fit for purpose at the time of sale. I've offered to go down or pay a 3rd party to ride the horse as well. Suggested checking tack, bit, saddle fit, back teeth etc
She received my letter and called me again last night and was just so rude. Accused me of all sorts of things, ripping people off, drugging etc. I suggested the mare hadn't settled in with her and to have some lessons and was told she was 'very experienced' and didn't need any help. She hasn't done any of the checks I suggested. Told me to hurry up and get down to ride the horse as she has someone booked to take it away for meat. I just can't believe it. She has not had anyone else out to help her or even assess the horse to say it is dangerous.
I do't want to go down there now as I think we could possibly get into a confrontation so arranging a 3rd party to go down and ride the horse. I guess my question is, I believe I have done everything right before the sale and now helping on a goodwill basis....will I be ok if it gets to court? I believe from what I've read that the buyer has to prove the horse was unfit for purpose at the time of sale. Does anyone have any experience with this type of claim?
2 weeks after buying her I received a call saying she had been difficult to hack out that day, spooking, jogging etc. I gave her some advice (she hadn't been using the same tack ie martingale) as me, she said she was going to put her on a herbal mare supplement; I also gave her the number of someone who lived in the same village who could help get her going and she could use her school. I also passed on the old owners phone number (and a copy of the ad I bought the horse from) in case she could help. All seemed ok. Then 4 days later the buyer called me again threatening me court action! Since that ride she hadn't ridden the mare out, she rode her in the field and said she was putting her head up and evading so she gave up. She now says that the mare is dangerous, unsafe to be ridden and will be pts! That she has bolted (tho apparently 'jumping forward 3 feet is bolting'), reared (but not upright on her back legs she has bounced) etc She claims she is not fit for purpose, she was screeching down the phone at me that she has taken legal advice and quoting 'the sale of goods act 1979''. I refused to take the horse back over the phone as said she was absolutely fine and asked her to write to me.
I have written her a formal letter detailing the above and also have witnesses who have ridden the horse just prior to her purchase (including someone who tried the horse). I have absolutely no reason to believe the horse wasn't fit for purpose at the time of sale. I've offered to go down or pay a 3rd party to ride the horse as well. Suggested checking tack, bit, saddle fit, back teeth etc
She received my letter and called me again last night and was just so rude. Accused me of all sorts of things, ripping people off, drugging etc. I suggested the mare hadn't settled in with her and to have some lessons and was told she was 'very experienced' and didn't need any help. She hasn't done any of the checks I suggested. Told me to hurry up and get down to ride the horse as she has someone booked to take it away for meat. I just can't believe it. She has not had anyone else out to help her or even assess the horse to say it is dangerous.
I do't want to go down there now as I think we could possibly get into a confrontation so arranging a 3rd party to go down and ride the horse. I guess my question is, I believe I have done everything right before the sale and now helping on a goodwill basis....will I be ok if it gets to court? I believe from what I've read that the buyer has to prove the horse was unfit for purpose at the time of sale. Does anyone have any experience with this type of claim?