Zebedee
Well-Known Member
[ QUOTE ]
On another note- how many people have their medical arm bands filled in? I was at PC areas and during the tack check before xc, the steward said "Oh thank heavens, someone who actually has their arm band filled in!". Obviously there were a lot of people without the info in the armbands, making them totally pointless?!
[/ QUOTE ]
BRC now specify in their rules that the cards must be filled in. This was introduced after it came to light that an entire team were sharing one as it didn't say that it had to be filled in, only that it must be worn
Don't know if BE have caught up with that one though
The thing is those of you who object to being told where to wear them seem to think there should be an element of choice. This is all very well until something goes wrong - maybe someone is given something they are allergic to for pain & decides to sue an organising body. Chances are the courts (or even the coroner) would ask what guidelines were in place & if there had been a problem with finding the relevent information would then ask why there wasn't a specific place for such information to be located.
It is far more likely for a leg to become inaccessable than an arm although not impossible for an arm to be trapped.
I wish people would take on board that organising/governing bodies have a duty of care to protect those taking part in the activities that the have juristiction over, & if they fail in that to the smallest detail can be held liable. Rule such as this are in place to protect the ridrs from dangerous (even life threatening) mistakes, as well as discharging the required duty of care. This particular requirement has come about because medics & medical officers have raised the subject & their recommendations have been applied. No one sits round a table trying to think of petty little rule changes purely to p1ss people off.
On another note- how many people have their medical arm bands filled in? I was at PC areas and during the tack check before xc, the steward said "Oh thank heavens, someone who actually has their arm band filled in!". Obviously there were a lot of people without the info in the armbands, making them totally pointless?!
[/ QUOTE ]
BRC now specify in their rules that the cards must be filled in. This was introduced after it came to light that an entire team were sharing one as it didn't say that it had to be filled in, only that it must be worn
The thing is those of you who object to being told where to wear them seem to think there should be an element of choice. This is all very well until something goes wrong - maybe someone is given something they are allergic to for pain & decides to sue an organising body. Chances are the courts (or even the coroner) would ask what guidelines were in place & if there had been a problem with finding the relevent information would then ask why there wasn't a specific place for such information to be located.
It is far more likely for a leg to become inaccessable than an arm although not impossible for an arm to be trapped.
I wish people would take on board that organising/governing bodies have a duty of care to protect those taking part in the activities that the have juristiction over, & if they fail in that to the smallest detail can be held liable. Rule such as this are in place to protect the ridrs from dangerous (even life threatening) mistakes, as well as discharging the required duty of care. This particular requirement has come about because medics & medical officers have raised the subject & their recommendations have been applied. No one sits round a table trying to think of petty little rule changes purely to p1ss people off.