whirlwindhorses
Well-Known Member
Awesome pics!!! That's interesting to know that's he's sired full leopards because my 4yo's sire is only a near-leopard himself but has sired full leopards from solid mares (who I suspect have no PATN genes themselves although could be wrong).
Thanks so much for the chart Faracat - what's the current thinking for PATN2? I thought it had been dismissed because of lack of proof for it? I suppose withou having a test for PATN it's impossible to say because theoretically a louder-than-the-sire/dam's PATN gene may be hidden in a non Lp other parent, but I do wonder if the PATN gene is like Tobiano - PATN itself codes for the white colour and other genes determine how large an area it covers and what shape it is - just like Tobiano on its own codes for solid patches of white but not the spread of them?
My 4yo's sire has sired a variety of leopards, near-leopards, lacey blankets (and Lp and non-Lp but they're not relevant to the PATN gene in this point so much) so I guess he could carry more than one PATN gene - but he has never (to the best of my knowledge) sired a foal who had a white blanket with black spots at birth, and to the best of my knowledge none have spotted out to look like a 'normal' blanket spot either. Could just be coincidence and the non-Lp horses he's sired WOULD have exhibited the classic blanket-spot pattern if they'd had the Lp gene to allow it to be shown, but my point is that if he carries the theoretical PATN2 gene then surely he would've passed it to approx half his foals, approx half would've had the Lp gene too, so approx 25% would've had a blanket spot pattern? (Theoretically he has to carry PATN2 if we're going by that model because he has produced spotteds who have a white pattern at birth (so suspected to not be due to Lp) which doesn't cover their whole body like a leopard.)
I suppose what I'm getting at is that in this case, my hypothetical model of PATN as being similar to Tobiano in that it just codes for white and other genes affect the black spots and area of cover of the white areas holds truer than PATN1 and PATN2?
Obviously I'm looking at just one line though and appreciate there are tons more out there - my boy's line could have an odd variation to the rule!!!
Now I shall probably re-read this and find it makes no sense as I'm only thinking out loud LOL!!!
Really glad this thread's proving to be of interest to so many - I find colour genetics fascinating too![]()
How many foals has his sire sired? How many of those leopards, etc were out of Appaloosa mares? Did he breed leopard from solid non Appaloosa mares? You can only truely tell what genes an Appaloosa is carrying by what he sires out of solid non Appaloosa mares, and you need a fair number of foals to work out what pattern they consistently breed. He might be the only one with black spots because his dam was also carrying black, remember both parents have to carry black to get it. And are they definately black or black bay spots?