Scummycat
Member
My husband was given a share in Stage Star as a birthday gift, right at the very beginning of his career, and we've thoroughly enjoyed following him. We've seen some fantastic successes and I think he's currently the winning most horse in the Owners Group stable, which has been a great experience.
We have, however, recently become a bit disillusioned with the choices being made for him in terms of taking his career forwards. Obviously no one expects him to win every time out, and having been involved with horses myself in several disciplines, I totally understand the vagaries of having them at their best at any one time. However, given that, for example, he's always run better when fresh at the start of the season, why would you send him to Aintree when his previous results there have been awful? Or why would you continue to enter him in handicaps where his rating means that he's giving away close to 2 stone on his nearest rival and then seemingly be puzzled when he can't quicken at the end?
I absolutely fess up to the fact that race selection wouldn't be my specialist subject but I guess I'm really looking for anyone who's more involved in or knowledgeable about racing to help us understand why Stage Star's career seems to be stalling, and why there seems to be so much difficulty in forming a plan for his season. All of the information we receive from Owner's Group seems to be around "having a think" about what to do next, or "seeing how he is", with even talk about sending him to Windsor in a Grade 4 handicap where he'd apparently give away nearly 3 stone.
We've had a great time with Owner's Group, and it's a fantastic way for many people to be even a little bit involved with racehorse ownership, so it's a real shame that one of the best horses to come through their system seems to be being a bit wasted - to the non-racing specialist at least. As I said, we're definitely not expecting him to win every race, and it's still a lot of fun, but he seems to be being entered in races where he won't even be competitive, and that's all anyone wants to see really.
Do other Stage Star owners feel the same or does everyone else understand "the plan" better than we do?
We have, however, recently become a bit disillusioned with the choices being made for him in terms of taking his career forwards. Obviously no one expects him to win every time out, and having been involved with horses myself in several disciplines, I totally understand the vagaries of having them at their best at any one time. However, given that, for example, he's always run better when fresh at the start of the season, why would you send him to Aintree when his previous results there have been awful? Or why would you continue to enter him in handicaps where his rating means that he's giving away close to 2 stone on his nearest rival and then seemingly be puzzled when he can't quicken at the end?
I absolutely fess up to the fact that race selection wouldn't be my specialist subject but I guess I'm really looking for anyone who's more involved in or knowledgeable about racing to help us understand why Stage Star's career seems to be stalling, and why there seems to be so much difficulty in forming a plan for his season. All of the information we receive from Owner's Group seems to be around "having a think" about what to do next, or "seeing how he is", with even talk about sending him to Windsor in a Grade 4 handicap where he'd apparently give away nearly 3 stone.
We've had a great time with Owner's Group, and it's a fantastic way for many people to be even a little bit involved with racehorse ownership, so it's a real shame that one of the best horses to come through their system seems to be being a bit wasted - to the non-racing specialist at least. As I said, we're definitely not expecting him to win every race, and it's still a lot of fun, but he seems to be being entered in races where he won't even be competitive, and that's all anyone wants to see really.
Do other Stage Star owners feel the same or does everyone else understand "the plan" better than we do?