Booboos
Well-Known Member
Probably would - but that isn't what they are designed to do, nor is there any evidence (other than common sense) that they would. To be honest, my points here are mostly pedantic - they shouldn't be referred to as back protectors (as some have on this thread) and it shouldn't necessarily be assumed that there will be any significant benefit in terms of preventing spinal injuries. Broken ribs, internal soft tissue injuries etc are more relevant.
There is no evidence either way on any of that. The BETA advice is very vague. If you think that spinal cords may be injured by the high levels of energy caused by falling and BPs may provide protection from those high levels of energy then BPs may protect from spinal cord injuries. That is all I can find evidence of, in light of which it is wisest not to make claims about the inability of BPs to protect against injury. If there is no evidence either way then it seems irresponsible to suggest a safety piece of kit does not work based on personal and anecdotal experience - that was the point of my post.
Do you have any evidence on how spinal injuries are caused during riding falls and/or on what BPs are designed to do that shows that the two have no connection?