Caol Ila
Well-Known Member
Some late night musings. Even with the best vets, physios, behaviourists, and animal communicators, unraveling their behavour is still a lot of inference and storytelling.
Today, we went to Red Bridge, a small bridge with red railings that's slightly wider than your average horse and has clangy metal underfoot. Hermosa has not done the Red Bridge before. Fin went straight across, and she slammed on the brakes. Due to the width and height of the railings, I did not want to be on board if she got weird in the middle of it, plus she can be braver when led, so I jumped off and tried to coax her over. She wasn't having it. Firmly planted. The park was busy, so we were in the way of other people using the bridge, and the flies were annoying. After 10 minutes, I decided it wasn't our day for Red Bridge, called chaps89, OH, and Fin back, and we went the other way. The bridge is not critical. There is another slightly longer trail between A and B.
Story #1: Horse was being stubborn and taking the piss. I should have made the right thing easy and the wrong thing hard by putting on pressure until she gave in and went over the bridge, which would have taught her an important lesson. She was rewarded for her stubborness by turning around.
Story #2: Horse was genuinely frightened by narrow bridge, despite seeing me, Fin, OH, and other people on it. Coercing her onto it would have taken a significant escalation of pressure and associating it with more fear. If she was okay enough with it, she would have gone, as she does with other things. By turning around, I showed that I will listen to her and won't intimidate her into doing things, and we will save the bridge for a day with less flies, more time, and more carrots.
We tell ourselves lots of stories about our horses. Do they come from an adversarial place, where the horse wants to challenge us, and we need to show it who's in charge? Do they come from a cooperative place, where we assume the horse wants to do what we ask, but don't feel they can for whatever reason? Is it both, and we need to figure it out the difference?
Today, we went to Red Bridge, a small bridge with red railings that's slightly wider than your average horse and has clangy metal underfoot. Hermosa has not done the Red Bridge before. Fin went straight across, and she slammed on the brakes. Due to the width and height of the railings, I did not want to be on board if she got weird in the middle of it, plus she can be braver when led, so I jumped off and tried to coax her over. She wasn't having it. Firmly planted. The park was busy, so we were in the way of other people using the bridge, and the flies were annoying. After 10 minutes, I decided it wasn't our day for Red Bridge, called chaps89, OH, and Fin back, and we went the other way. The bridge is not critical. There is another slightly longer trail between A and B.
Story #1: Horse was being stubborn and taking the piss. I should have made the right thing easy and the wrong thing hard by putting on pressure until she gave in and went over the bridge, which would have taught her an important lesson. She was rewarded for her stubborness by turning around.
Story #2: Horse was genuinely frightened by narrow bridge, despite seeing me, Fin, OH, and other people on it. Coercing her onto it would have taken a significant escalation of pressure and associating it with more fear. If she was okay enough with it, she would have gone, as she does with other things. By turning around, I showed that I will listen to her and won't intimidate her into doing things, and we will save the bridge for a day with less flies, more time, and more carrots.
We tell ourselves lots of stories about our horses. Do they come from an adversarial place, where the horse wants to challenge us, and we need to show it who's in charge? Do they come from a cooperative place, where we assume the horse wants to do what we ask, but don't feel they can for whatever reason? Is it both, and we need to figure it out the difference?