cptrayes
Well-Known Member
Not worth the effort, all it will turn into is town v countryside.
I find that argument both trite and patronising. There are plenty of country people who do not agree with hunting with hounds or shooting birds.
Not worth the effort, all it will turn into is town v countryside.
Yet again a vast amount of rubbish being spouted by people who have no knowledge of the countryside, farming, land and wildlife management.
Frightening ignorance.
I'd add to that; Now that Hunting as it was previously carried out, is banned, there are those who fail to understand that it's the Fox which has suffered. When there were preserves and when Hunting was considered to be an honourable system of management, there was tolerance and harmony. Now the hand of every oick with a FAC has turned his hand against the Fox, and as a species, the animal no longer enjoys his privileged and exalted position.
It's the Fox as an animal who has suffered the most from this ridiculous and Class based bigotry.
Alec.
……..
There were plenty of areas like mine that were never fox hunted by hounds you know!
I feel quite sure that if you do your research, you'll find that once upon a time there was a resident pack in Wapping. It must have been Wapping as that's where most of your poorly researched and claimed knowledge seems to originate from.
Alec.
Hunting provides employment to many and makes money for many.
bovine tb needs addressing with a countrywide cull of badgers, milk payments need reviewing. The countryside and it's associated activities is an industry and deserves far more understanding and respect.what does this have to do with this thread topic?
so does dog fighting, it does not make it right Alice.
bovine tb needs addressing with a countrywide cull of badgers, milk payments need reviewing. The countryside and it's associated activities is an industry and deserves far more understanding and respect.what does this have to do with this thread topic?
I give in.
Hunting provides employment to many and makes money for many. People produce hunters that sell for a lot of money. I vaguely remember seeing your signature picture on an advert recently with the horse being targeted at the market for huntsman or whip's horse, about a week ago I think.
.
Hunting provides employment to many and makes money for many.
And in spite of dire warnings about unemployed farriers and livery owners etc, by the Countryside Alliance, in the first years of the ban, when it was widely adhered to, numbers of people hunting INCREASED.
So what would that tell us? Either that the criminal and/or rebellious aspect of those who live a truly rural existence, is on the increase, or-(and possibly)-and, that those who live within and embrace the countryside, are sick of those who with neither understanding nor care, would tell them that they 'mustn't'. Either way the neauvou-arrives, would be better advised to either return from whence they came, or embrace the rural lifestyle which most seem to find acceptable.
Alec.
So what would that tell us? Either that the criminal and/or rebellious aspect of those who live a truly rural existence, is on the increase, or-(and possibly)-and, that those who live within and embrace the countryside, are sick of those who with neither understanding nor care, would tell them that they 'mustn't'. Either way the neauvou-arrives, would be better advised to either return from whence they came, or embrace the rural lifestyle which most seem to find acceptable.
Alec.
Hunting provides employment to many and makes money for many.
Uhm, slightly nervous of entering into this debate but I do think it's worth at least being open to the possibility that some people have joined hunting post-ban because they weren't in support of hunting foxes, and do support post-ban hunting. Equally I suspect you have a point, that others have joined to show their support and are against the ban.
This will probably sound rude and I don't mean it to be, I know it's not directly on topic but with regards to those that have issues with bird shoots and I think "shooting them half dead out of the sky" was said. I'm just interested to know how else it could be done, as I have taken part (non shooting, just collecting) in a local duck shoot.
I'm not sure how it's done elsewhere but everyone who shot took home a portion of the shot ducks. The ones who were shot but not killed instantly were dispatched as soon as possible - and it was pretty quick I promise! - I know this as I was part of the collect and dispatch team although tbh I only dispatched one myself as I'd never done it before. I even got 2 ducks to take home for taking part even though I never fired a shot and plucked and de-breasted them myself. They made for a very lovely treat for dinner. I'm against animal cruelty but nothing on the shoot that I witnessed was cruel IMO.
I can't comment on fox hunting as I have 0 experience or knowledge.
You don't think it's cruel to deliberately cause a bird to fall out of the sky hurt but not dead, and be picked up by a dog? For fun?
I am open to the persuasion that it is the most humane way of culling bird poulations which must be culled, but around here they are breeding birds simply so that people can have the fun of shooting them.
I'd rather have the life of a pheasant 'shot half dead out of the sky' than that of a mass produced chicken destined for the supermarket shelf. I know which I think is more inhumane!
I'd rather have the life of a pheasant 'shot half dead out of the sky' than that of a mass produced chicken destined for the supermarket shelf. I know which I think is more inhumane!
When did two wrongs make a right?
Uhm, slightly nervous of entering into this debate but I do think it's worth at least being open to the possibility that some people have joined hunting post-ban because they weren't in support of hunting foxes, and do support post-ban hunting. Equally I suspect you have a point, that others have joined to show their support and are against the ban.
Two wrongs never make a right. However I sincerely hope that those who are so vehemently opposed to hunting/shooting/fishing take as much care as I do when sourcing meat/animal products and don't just pick the cheap meat from the supermarket shelves without a thought for the life that animal has led and the death it has met.
the urban dictates which are being handed down, by those who neither know nor care about those of us who live in the long grass!!
Alec.
Surely that decision is best left to each person's own ethical code ? Personally, chasing and killing a wild animal just for fun isn't something I'd find acceptable. Catching a fish, or shooting a pheasant to be eaten at dinner, is.
I do not buy cheap meat from unknown origin at supermarkets, but if I only had the choice of buying cheap food or my children going hungry, I would. Being ethical is about getting priorities right.
Would you be eating the foxes killed by the hunt ?
……..
……... I would not eat meat from an animal that led a miserable life - not to my knowledge anyway. If I couldn't afford to buy meat of provenance I was confident of I would simply eat meat less often and so would my children. Those are my ethics and I am comfortable with my beliefs.