To move or not to move?

MrsElle

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 November 2008
Messages
6,184
Location
Back Where My Heart Is :)
Visit site
I have been offered the chance to rent some more land and am torn - I don't know whether to stay put or move. Here are my options:

Option 1 - current.

Pro's.

Only a couple of hundred yards from home, if that.
Costs £25 a month to rent.
Lovely landlord, nice neighbours (apart from one).
Water supply.

Con's.

Only one acre for the two horses.
No stable or field shelter (but could put up my own shelter).
One nasty neighbour.


Option 2.

Pro's.

2.5 acres, plus stable, plus feed/tack room.
Nice hacking
Use of jumps and area that can be utilised as a school.
No neighbours

Con's.

It is 4 miles away, takes between 5 and 10 minutes to drive to.
It is £100 a month
No water supply in fields, would have to bucket it down from tack room.

So, which would you choose? I am torn. The potential new place is nice, enough land for the horses plus a stable for old girl Ellie to use in the winter. However, I love having the horses so close to me, although the grazing is crap and there is no stable/shelter up.

I hate decisions!
 

MrsMozart

Just passing through...
Joined
27 June 2008
Messages
41,457
Location
Not where I should be...
Visit site
Dunno. Head hurts. But one acre for two horse, including winter...
blush.gif
.
 

Grey_Eventer

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 June 2008
Messages
2,698
Visit site
if you can afford the second place and can set up a water system which doesnt envolve you carrying buckets down- we have a huge conatiner of water with a tube into the water trough which you turn on and fills up the water trough, when it gets low the farmer takes it away, fills it up and brings it back.. could you organise something like that? if you can afford the second place then i would choose there!
 

MrsElle

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 November 2008
Messages
6,184
Location
Back Where My Heart Is :)
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
Dunno. Head hurts. But one acre for two horse, including winter...
blush.gif
.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats what I thought, we haven't done a winter there and can imagine it being a sea of mud by December. But I do like it there. *sigh*
 

MrsMozart

Just passing through...
Joined
27 June 2008
Messages
41,457
Location
Not where I should be...
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Dunno. Head hurts. But one acre for two horse, including winter...
blush.gif
.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats what I thought, we haven't done a winter there and can imagine it being a sea of mud by December. But I do like it there. *sigh*

[/ QUOTE ]

In that case, any chance of some extra land there?
 

3Beasties

Well-Known Member
Joined
7 September 2008
Messages
15,574
Visit site
I have 2.5 acre for one horse and a pony and it is hell in winter (they are in at night too), 1 acre for two horses would be even worse.
crazy.gif


I can see your dilema (sp?) though, it is so hard moving them when you are used to having them so close to home. Is it possible to move to option 2 nearer winter? or would you have to move sooner?

I think if you don't move you will be regretting it as soon as the weather turns.
 

MistletoeMegan

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 August 2006
Messages
3,255
Location
Suffolk
Visit site
Option 2 - well worth the extra money.

Keep big containers near the fields and fill them up at the weekends or whenever you have time, and then just top the field up from there
smile.gif
 

horseywelsh

Well-Known Member
Joined
20 January 2009
Messages
1,536
Visit site
i would say move, we used to have our horses literally 2 mins walk from home (rented) but then some land came up for sale (5/10mins away in car), best thing we ever did, would love to hav them on door step again, but now we have our own place, we don't have any water, we bucket it and manage fine. I know you would be renting, but facilities and land sound better.

at end of day, only you can decide.
 

DW Team

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 February 2009
Messages
3,022
Location
Lincs
Visit site
Option 2 and get one of the barrow water sacks that some one on here was writing about the other week. Sack fits into barrow and take that down to the field from the yard. When you get the water bag empty you could bring the barrow back with droppings from pooh picking!!
 

MrsElle

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 November 2008
Messages
6,184
Location
Back Where My Heart Is :)
Visit site
Looks like I am moving then
smile.gif


I know it will be better for the horses having more grazing and having a proper stable for Ellie in the winter but I guess I was worried about not having them so close. I will keep the other paddock on though, I have paid for a year up front so still have it until next February. At least I can bring them up here occasionally to give their new paddocks a rest
smile.gif


Thanks guys!
 

mik

Well-Known Member
Joined
2 October 2008
Messages
3,869
Location
Spain.
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
Second one, 4miles is nothing and water systems can be put in so i'd go for it. Too many pro's

[/ QUOTE ]


ditto
grin.gif
 

Pearlsasinger

Up in the clouds
Joined
20 February 2009
Messages
47,307
Location
W. Yorks
Visit site
I vote for both. I can quite see that you need extra land/grass but would be reluctant myself to move them further away from home, so if you can have both that's what I would do and then at least sometimes they'll be close.
 

shellonabeach

Well-Known Member
Joined
8 February 2006
Messages
800
Location
Cambridgeshire
Visit site
I third what Nuala and Pearlasinger suggest. You could keep them close to home during the summer (closer for evening rides and a water supply when they are drinking more in the heat) and then where the stable is during the winter (stabling / storage and more land to cope with winter TO).

£125 in total a month for 2 horses isn't bad at all IMO
 
Top