Smurf's Gran
Well-Known Member
whats a PITA
I take offense to that! Fell ponies mmost certainly are not PITA's!!! My fell was one of the best, most honest, genuine ponies you could ever wish to meet. Carried weighy not a problem. Showed, hunted, galloped with racehorses, did a bit of everything. And he was 'only 13.2hh' but he rode more like a 15.2hh as he was built like a brick outhouse!
Perhaps im soft but i certainly wouldn't put 14 stones on that skewbald pictured above, or anything less that a 15.2 HW (built like a brick @&£)house). Im of the, they may be 'able' to carry the weight, but should they have to camp
Personally I wouldn't be in too much of a hurry to get another horse, the weight is going to prey on your mind - set a target of say 3 months to make some of the surplus go away and then get the dream horse and off you go. In the meantime you could get yourself ready by thrashing a bike about the place (my bike regularly just lays down on corners or bucks me off so all good practice).
Sorry to be picky but a light weight saddle is more like half a stone not a stone. My jumping saddle is 7kgs and I wouldn't call that a light weight saddle. Many synthetics are 4.5kgs or less.
I've just weighed my synthetic thorowgood saddle with leathers and composite stirrups, girth and numnah and it's 5.2kgs in total.
Personally I wouldn't be in too much of a hurry to get another horse, the weight is going to prey on your mind - set a target of say 3 months to make some of the surplus go away and then get the dream horse and off you go. In the meantime you could get yourself ready by thrashing a bike about the place (my bike regularly just lays down on corners or bucks me off so all good practice).
Sorry to be picky but a light weight saddle is more like half a stone not a stone. My jumping saddle is 7kgs and I wouldn't call that a light weight saddle. Many synthetics are 4.5kgs or less.
I've just weighed my synthetic thorowgood saddle with leathers and composite stirrups, girth and numnah and it's 5.2kgs in total.
Yes, I'm still in two minds about what to doFunnily enough, I don't actually look that big and I'm not worried about saddle size. I'd like to think I'm a balanced rider who rides lightly or I was anyway, I haven't rode for quite a while.
I can't decide what to do!!!!
My friend has a 14hh Fell. In fact there's a couple in the area. None are particularly good weight carriers and feel about half the size of a 14hh Highland! I'm tall but only 10st and happily ride various 14hh Highlands but don't feel comfortable on a 14hh Fell.
Plus they're also PITA's!
The Chestnut mare you linked looks a sensible type and does appear to have a decent back on her. She may look ( and feel) different in the flesh but if she's a big 15hh (as opposed to a 14.2-and-a-little-bit-but-15hh-sounds-better)) then she may be suitable. Go and see her if she's close?
P.s if you've got £2.5k to spend you'll easily find a nice Highland up here. It'll be a bit green but nothing wrong with it. Mind you it's a hell of a trek if you're
in Kent or somewhere equally foreign![]()
Someone earlier posted 3 links to articles about the weight carrying ability of horses according to a controlled scientific study yet somehow everyone's still just throwing around personal opinions.
Get a horse that weighs at least 5 times what you do (healthy weight for it) and has a wide loin. Then it will actually be unstressed and not just 'look' able and you won't have to worry about it.
Just as a side note...
Since when did riding gear add two stone in weight?! What are you guys wearing, lead boots?
Wearing my jods, a top, my jumper, riding hat and boots may add a few pounds but two stone.. I don't think so.
My dad and my sister (both over 12 stone) share a 14.1 cob (146.3 LHC Obv without shoes). He easily takes them + a 17.5 inch saddle. He'd take 14 stone easily
https://sophiecallahan.wordpress.com/2015/04/08/millie-frankie-equine-photography-essex/
Perhaps the problem is people are too embarrassed to say it in person?
They mean tack too. Although the arguing over detail of synthetic v leather +/- plastic stirrups and bridle is a bit of a moot point: if you've needing to contemplate such minor weight differences as the difference between Can and Can't then the horse isn't up to the weight in the first place!
How can it be moot? It's exactly the point. If a pony is good to carry 14 stone then it can carry 14 stone and within that the rider could be 13 stone if she could get her tack down to a stone (tough job but possible). If she is 12.7 and her tack 2 stone then that's half a stone over her ideal limit.
If the rider were nine stone then she could use a twenty pound saddle (and there are plenty of those). I don't understand your logic here. There are no minor weight differences when you start looking at shaving a whole stone off the weight of your tack by making some simple changes.
If the difference between can and can't is only 1/2 a stone of tack (poss a stone at most) then the rider is too close to the border to be fair. Yes, synthetic lightweight tack give the horse a slightly lighter load but if a rider 'needs' the lightweight tack to be able to ride that horse then actually they need a bigger horse!!
If the OP (or any larger rider) wanted to shave a little off for a horse that carries her weight easily, regardless, that's great. But suggesting she can get away with a horse that's really too small for her by quibbling over less than a stones worth of tack isn't fair for the pony.
If the difference between can and can't is only 1/2 a stone of tack (poss a stone at most) then the rider is too close to the border to be fair. Yes, synthetic lightweight tack give the horse a slightly lighter load but if a rider 'needs' the lightweight tack to be able to ride that horse then actually they need a bigger horse!!
If the OP (or any larger rider) wanted to shave a little off for a horse that carries her weight easily, regardless, that's great. But suggesting she can get away with a horse that's really too small for her by quibbling over less than a stones worth of tack isn't fair for the pony.
My dad and my sister (both over 12 stone) share a 14.1 cob (146.3 LHC Obv without shoes). He easily takes them + a 17.5 inch saddle. He'd take 14 stone easily
https://sophiecallahan.wordpress.com/2015/04/08/millie-frankie-equine-photography-essex/
I've come to the conclusion that I'm going to have to increase the budget, I can't find anything suitable for under £3K and to be honest, I'd rather spend the money on a horse instead of it going towards a holiday! I think it's between a cob and ID I've seen a nice 15.3 HW cob, 12 years old been there done it type who looks fab. I need to confirm with YO when the stable will be available then I'm going to start looking properly. Best to have something sufficient for this weight then losing weight will be a bonus for the both of us rather than an absolute necessity.
Hi again OP .
Your decision about the budget and buying a horse up to your weight is wise .
The cheapest thing you ever do is buy the horse the real expense is after that , keeping the horse .
You are not to heavy to ride the correct horse but a word of caution falling off is another matter , having been light and heavy and now in the middle I can tell you from experience that you feel the falls less when you are the correct weight for your height and build .
Start that sensible eating plan now look for ways to make your day to day life more active even pushing to do jobs quicker makes a difference parking at the back of the car park not the front etc .
I had great fun with my fit bit ( till I lost it riding ) increasing my mileage per day in every day life and I saw the difference in my size at once .
Hi OP
Firstly, as many have agreed on you are not too fat to ride.
I'm just over 13 stone and have a 15.3 warmblood with plenty of bone, although she also carried me happily when I weighed a bit more. She suits me and I don't think I would feel comfortable on a 14 hander
Anyway, If you would like something smaller have you thought about looking at an Icelandic horse?
http://ihsgb.co.uk/icelandic-horses/
If the difference between can and can't is only 1/2 a stone of tack (poss a stone at most) then the rider is too close to the border to be fair. Yes, synthetic lightweight tack give the horse a slightly lighter load but if a rider 'needs' the lightweight tack to be able to ride that horse then actually they need a bigger horse!!
If the OP (or any larger rider) wanted to shave a little off for a horse that carries her weight easily, regardless, that's great. But suggesting she can get away with a horse that's really too small for her by quibbling over less than a stones worth of tack isn't fair for the pony.