Tough sentencing from the courts

[Pedantic]

Wow, the sentence really reflects the seriousness of the crime, (see quote) the Judge must have been having a bad day, or not got his leg over the night before, other people with these dogs must be s****ing themselves, the courts really take this animal ccraap seriously dont they.........

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/merseyside/10202118.stm



"It is clear that this case - the death of your nephew - was entirely the result of your actions and your negligence"

 

[tangoharvey]

"Tests later showed that the animal was a pit-bull, a breed banned under the Dangerous Dogs Act" Dont tell me you think the man thought his dog was a nice gentle breed??? Good on the judge I say!

 

[Angelbones]

Four months - good grief

It adds up to manslaughter in my book and he should have paid. Imbecile

 

[benson21]

Only 4 months!!! For owning a dog that killed a boy, attacked a woman, a breed that is banned under the dangerous dogs act.
Ought to have been a bloody sight longer in my view!!!

 

[tangoharvey]

god i am thick - thought pedantic was saying he shouldnt have gone to prison, in total agreement it should have been MUCH longer!