Towing with a Subaru

W

Widgeon

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 January 2017
Messages
4,824
Location
N Yorks
Visit site
A highly specific question, but we're looking at replacing our 2006 diesel Volvo XC70 with a 2016 diesel Subaru Outback (this one, to be exact).

I only tow a single trailer and a small horse, so the Volvo does a great job (I adore this car but it's getting old and won't live forever - we need a replacement lined up) and I'm just wondering if anyone has experience of the Outback? I know it wouldn't be much good towing a double trailer, but I don't care about that as I don't need to do it.

The model we're looking at is a manual, which is a pain (I've only ever towed with an automatic), but there aren't many of these cars about second hand, particularly not diesels, so beggars can't be choosers.

For some reason more people seem to tow with the Forester, but it's my understanding that the Outback actually has a slightly higher tow capacity than the Forester. However I am by no means an expert on any of this so any information on Outbacks, towing with a manual, etc, would be appreciated - thanks.
 
I had a much older one (2003) and it was an absolutely brilliant car, lovely to drive and to tow with. It was a petrol automatic though and I would def recommend the automatic if you can find and afford one.
 
Check the cars tow capacity - I have a feeling it’s 1.8-2t which should be sufficient for ponies or a single horse.

I have to say, I had a legacy with a 1.8t capacity and never towed with it, it wasnt a car I had much faith in. I think some of the newer ones, particularly the outback are better now
 
The Outbacks are fabulous cars (friend has one who did a bit of rallying in her younger years and adores it), but I don’t know what they’re like for towing.

Can you expand your search area to find an auto one, like the eBay one?
 
Last edited:
shortstuff99 said:
If you can get one Subaru Forresters are (or at least were) brilliant to tow with.
Click to expand...
There do seem to be more Forresters around. I would imagine the Outback would be reasonably similar though, on the whole. For a diesel around 2017, the Forrester has a sniff (100kg) more capacity than the Outback. So they must be pretty similar. That's nice to hear you have a good opinion of the Forrester.
 
Last edited:
ihatework said:
Check the cars tow capacity - I have a feeling it’s 1.8-2t which should be sufficient for ponies or a single horse.

I have to say, I had a legacy with a 1.8t capacity and never towed with it, it wasnt a car I had much faith in. I think some of the newer ones, particularly the outback are better now
Click to expand...
Yes, I also heard iffy things about the older Legacies. The newer Outbacks seem to have a much better rep.
 
ihatework said:
Check the cars tow capacity - I have a feeling it’s 1.8-2t which should be sufficient for ponies or a single horse.
Click to expand...
The Outback is 1700kg which will do fine for my setup (as compared to the Volvo's 1800kg). It's a bit more torquey than the Volvo so in theory I think it ought to tow just as well....but obviously while theory is all well and good it's nice to hear from some people who have actually driven them, so these replies are really helpful.
 
Barton Bounty said:
No one wants a tank 😂
Click to expand...
But joking aside, I find it amazing how many people DO. So many modern cars weigh huge amounts, take up loads of space, and don't necessarily have any more boot space or towing ability than my Volvo. I was at a fun ride recently and the parking was at the top of a grass slope. A massive Kia with two ponies in an Ifor got stuck at the bottom and literally couldn't make it up. The volunteers had to turn it around at the bottom and squeeze it onto the side of the track to park. This stupidly large flashy car, designed to look like it goes off roading before breakfast, and it couldn't tow two small ponies up a gentle slope.

I should caveat this to say that of course I see the benefit of a large and genuinely capable car when you're towing a heavier setup, but this trend for driving bigger and bigger cars regardless of need annoys me. Particularly when a lot of those cars are all mouth and no trousers, so to speak!
 
Widgeon said:
But joking aside, I find it amazing how many people DO. So many modern cars weigh huge amounts, take up loads of space, and don't necessarily have any more boot space or towing ability than my Volvo. I was at a fun ride recently and the parking was at the top of a grass slope. A massive Kia with two ponies in an Ifor got stuck at the bottom and literally couldn't make it up. The volunteers had to turn it around at the bottom and squeeze it onto the side of the track to park. This stupidly large flashy car, designed to look like it goes off roading before breakfast, and it couldn't tow two small ponies up a gentle slope.

I should caveat this to say that of course I see the benefit of a large and genuinely capable car when you're towing a heavier setup, but this trend for driving bigger and bigger cars regardless of need annoys me. Particularly when a lot of those cars are all mouth and no trousers, so to speak!
Click to expand...
Totally agree!

My friend has an xc70 she doesnt tow.

I have an L200 for practicality… was going to have a new car but decided a trailer instead.. 😂
 
For a really good and not huge tow car, have you considered a Skoda Octavia 4x4? More mainstream than a Subaru. There is an automatic version, although we’ve got the manual. It’s a compact middle size estate car, and an awesome tower. Good all rounder too, and on motorways.

Think the automatic tow limit is 1800kg, for our 15 plate manual it is 2000kg.

Disregard this suggestion if a Skoda doesn’t appeal 🙂.
 
Widgeon said:
But joking aside, I find it amazing how many people DO. So many modern cars weigh huge amounts, take up loads of space, and don't necessarily have any more boot space or towing ability than my Volvo. I was at a fun ride recently and the parking was at the top of a grass slope. A massive Kia with two ponies in an Ifor got stuck at the bottom and literally couldn't make it up. The volunteers had to turn it around at the bottom and squeeze it onto the side of the track to park. This stupidly large flashy car, designed to look like it goes off roading before breakfast, and it couldn't tow two small ponies up a gentle slope.

I should caveat this to say that of course I see the benefit of a large and genuinely capable car when you're towing a heavier setup, but this trend for driving bigger and bigger cars regardless of need annoys me. Particularly when a lot of those cars are all mouth and no trousers, so to speak!
Click to expand...

That's quite possibly bad driving, though.
 
Widgeon said:
Thanks for that enormously helpful comment - care to support with any facts or personal experience? Even just one small one would do.
Click to expand...
It’s a no based on:-

Transmission is not set up for towing
Rear suspension not set up for heavy duty towing
Whilst AWD - not effective as 4x4 in mud and slippery going
Engine too small in power to tow effectively
Front brakes/discs would be impacted if you didn’t have the brake unit in the trailer set up well

I have one and I LOVE it - especially the tech. Amazing in the snow as well but definitely not a tow vehicle. It can tow but is not set up well for such.
 
Tiddlypom said:
For a really good and not huge tow car, have you considered a Skoda Octavia 4x4? More mainstream than a Subaru. There is an automatic version, although we’ve got the manual. It’s a compact middle size estate car, and an awesome tower. Good all rounder too, and on motorways.

Think the automatic tow limit is 1800kg, for our 15 plate manual it is 2000kg.

Disregard this suggestion if a Skoda doesn’t appeal 🙂.
Click to expand...
I think Fiona who was on here had an Octavia 4x4 and towed no bother with it, loved it
 
Tiddlypom said:
For a really good and not huge tow car, have you considered a Skoda Octavia 4x4? More mainstream than a Subaru.
Click to expand...
Yes I have, this was my pick but husband is keen on the Subaru - he doesn't usually have strong opinions so I figured it's only fair he gets what he wants on the rare occasions that he does! Thanks though, I do appreciate the comment.
 
Bonnie Allie said:
It’s a no based on:-
Click to expand...
Ok, that's much more helpful, thank you. I'm not worried about AWD as that's what we currently have and it does the job fine; likewise suspension and braking will probably be ok as I only tow 1300kg. But I'll bear that all in mind, particularly regarding the transmission and the engine size.

Have you towed with yours? And just out of interest, what's your benchmark? If you're used to towing with a pickup or a Land Rover etc you probably have much higher expectations than I do!
 
If you only need 1300kg towing then yes I’d be happy with the Subaru. I did find the maintenance/ parts significantly more expensive on Subarus.

Depending on your overall needs other large estates may be adequate for you - Audi / Volvo /VW all do estates with raised ride height and AWD
 
teacups said:
Out of interest, why are neither you or OH considering another similar Volvo?
Click to expand...

The very short answer is that I don't like the modern ones. They're all huge, to start with, and they seem to be prone to electrical failures. I love my old Volvo so I was really keen to have another one, but I just don't think they make what we want any more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top