Gizmo4me
Member
Hi, my horse is 12 years old and never had a hard life, I've had him since he was 4. About 5 years ago he was diagnosed with navicular syndrome, which I dispute ! As I think he tore a ligament ! Although x-rays showed changes to the navicular bone in both feet it wasn't definitive that this was the cause of lameness. He had 2x Tildren treatments, several courses of cartrophen and bute / danillon. He had been sound for about 3 years then had intermittent lameness. About a month ago he went lame in his near fore and is still lame !!! We've tried bute etc, no difference once he's taken off, had a cortisone injection into the coffin joint and now started another course of cartrophen and having more Tildren !!! He is able to be ridden on 2x danillon a day and is sound on that.The vet has suggested de-nerving !! But I have asked for an MRI ( which I will have to pay for as no longer insured for navicular !) why do vets presume that any lameness in the foot is navicular ? I want reassurance that its not tissue damage that's causing the lameness. Any thoughts !!!