Archiesmummy
Well-Known Member
When a horse is deemed dangerous, unrideable, unmanageable or just a handful, in how many cases, would you say, it is the handlers/riders fault as opposed to the horses, the horse and owner/rider are incompatible?
I know of a horse who can be sharp when ridden but was bought as a hack and appears totally unsuitable for its owner. Not the horses fault. It would probably love going round a XC course or doing some ODE's (has a history of this) or even a happy hack doing a lot more, but no, the owner just wants to quietly poodle along keeps it to just a walk, trot on a good day. Every ride seems to be eventful, spins this way, spins that way, reverses into fencing, etc, so much so retirement is being considered. Owner rides at the crack of dawn to avoid this, that and the other, avoiding the norm. And feedback from previous owners seems that it wasn't always like this but owner insists poor horse is a nervous wreck and would not consider anyone else riding her horse, horse 'doesn't deserve it ...' BUT I am sure its because horse and rider are not suited. Owner is giving horse a home for life, a pampered life, but one where its intelligence just isn't tapped into on a daily basis, if at all. Does long term future override current needs?
It seems such a shame that such an intelligent horse is almost being shackled by its owners actions.
I am not saying all dangerous horses are redeemable but how many problem horses are of mans own doing?
It definitely makes sense of the meaning 'horses for courses' and in my experience a lot of people don't think about that, sometimes their expectations are way beyond their abilities but they just don't see it.
I know of a horse who can be sharp when ridden but was bought as a hack and appears totally unsuitable for its owner. Not the horses fault. It would probably love going round a XC course or doing some ODE's (has a history of this) or even a happy hack doing a lot more, but no, the owner just wants to quietly poodle along keeps it to just a walk, trot on a good day. Every ride seems to be eventful, spins this way, spins that way, reverses into fencing, etc, so much so retirement is being considered. Owner rides at the crack of dawn to avoid this, that and the other, avoiding the norm. And feedback from previous owners seems that it wasn't always like this but owner insists poor horse is a nervous wreck and would not consider anyone else riding her horse, horse 'doesn't deserve it ...' BUT I am sure its because horse and rider are not suited. Owner is giving horse a home for life, a pampered life, but one where its intelligence just isn't tapped into on a daily basis, if at all. Does long term future override current needs?
It seems such a shame that such an intelligent horse is almost being shackled by its owners actions.
I am not saying all dangerous horses are redeemable but how many problem horses are of mans own doing?
It definitely makes sense of the meaning 'horses for courses' and in my experience a lot of people don't think about that, sometimes their expectations are way beyond their abilities but they just don't see it.