Faro
...
I've got to agree with Katt about "real" ramblers and hikers. But having said that - not all dog walkers and others are bad. Unfortunately it's just a small few - but the same can be said for any walk of life.
I've got a footpath running through two of my fields. TBH it doesn't provide too much of a problem, the occasional dog walker comes through with a loose dog but that's the worst of it - guess I've been lucky so far.
I do suspect though that the Right to Roam bill has got a lot to do with some people's problems. The majority of dog and casual walkers (as opposed to ramblers and hikers) are most likely under the impression that Right to Roam gives them the right to go absolutely anywhere, which isn't the case.
And I freely admit that I myself don't correctly know what is/is not included in Right to Roam (note to self to look it up properly some time) - but what I do know is that there are certain restrictions in place. I'm inclined to think however, that many casual walkers simply don't know any better because they've heard of Right to Roam and they think it means they can go anywhere they like.
I've got a footpath running through two of my fields. TBH it doesn't provide too much of a problem, the occasional dog walker comes through with a loose dog but that's the worst of it - guess I've been lucky so far.
I do suspect though that the Right to Roam bill has got a lot to do with some people's problems. The majority of dog and casual walkers (as opposed to ramblers and hikers) are most likely under the impression that Right to Roam gives them the right to go absolutely anywhere, which isn't the case.
And I freely admit that I myself don't correctly know what is/is not included in Right to Roam (note to self to look it up properly some time) - but what I do know is that there are certain restrictions in place. I'm inclined to think however, that many casual walkers simply don't know any better because they've heard of Right to Roam and they think it means they can go anywhere they like.