What are your thoughts on the League Against Cruel Sports?

Terroist organisation not worth the time or money, whether you agree with hunting or not there's better ways to go about it than what they do!
 
Ok :rolleyes: I don't mind giving my opinion... they have good points and bad points but there are far better charities that cover 'cruel' sports out there... prepares to be lynched... :p
 
I am pro hunting, and not trying to start a row, actually.

What I am trying to do is discover what people think of them as a CHARITY, the difference between a lobbying organisation and a charitable one being fairly huge.

It was actually a question to ask whether, as a charity, people think they are more or less worthwhile?

Hunting forum is fairly relevant seeing as they are an anti hunting organisation.
 
Charity for what then, if its not against blood sports? do they support homeless animals, cats and dogs etc, do they support retired racehorses, retired grey hounds, Great Ormond Street/ what are you asking--
 
I believe they are against bull fighting, dog fighting, shooting of rare animals abroad etc. all of which iam totally against too, but, its the hunting that is their main "quarry"! thats why i am against their beliefs, along with the RSPCA.
 
I believe they are against bull fighting, dog fighting, shooting of rare animals abroad etc. all of which iam totally against too, but, its the hunting that is their main "quarry"! thats why i am against their beliefs, along with the RSPCA.

Yeah i'm totally against bullfighting and dog fighting as well as illegal poaching (I do legal shooting myself for meat) but they don't publisize these as much.
 
Charity for what then, if its not against blood sports? do they support homeless animals, cats and dogs etc, do they support retired racehorses, retired grey hounds, Great Ormond Street/ what are you asking--

Rosie is only angry because the SAVE ME campaign numbers have absolutely smashed all of the pro facebook groups, in just one week!!
 
I believe they are against bull fighting, dog fighting, shooting of rare animals abroad etc. all of which iam totally against too, but, its the hunting that is their main "quarry"! thats why i am against their beliefs, along with the RSPCA.

Of course you are against them because you support bloodsports lol
 
Yeah i'm totally against bullfighting and dog fighting as well as illegal poaching (I do legal shooting myself for meat) but they don't publisize these as much.

Are you for or against hoodies setting their dogs on urban foxes which will become legal the moment this ban is repealed ( not that I ever believe it will be).
 
just give it a rest, i took you off iggy as i thought you'd be decent,but sadly i am wrong- just piss taking as usual- do you get a kick from it??

At last the real rosie, the one who foul mouthes all over facebook. Do you get a kick out of banned bloodsports?? Oh, and far from mickey taking I am deadly serious about not letting hunting with dogs return and seeing animals ripped apart just because some members of our society wish to enjoy such things!

Post reported for swearing!
 
as for being angry SL, no, just disappointed at your cruel attitude towards me.

Cruel to you? Hardly. Have I set dogs on you and ripped you apart whilst out riding half cut with my equally bloodsport supporting chums, no.

Killing foxes like that according to you is fine and dandy but how could anybody be so cruel as to pull you up about it?!
 
Sl,considering i am disabled, in a wheel chair with a degenerating neurological disease i cannot see myself riding out"halfcut" as you say!you can report me as much as you like, you too have shown your true colours- so with that, you are on permanent iggy so i dont have to read your filth, abuse and **** anymore!! My body is knackered but my mind and brain are still ok so, to hell with you!
 
What I am trying to do is discover what people think of them as a CHARITY, the difference between a lobbying organisation and a charitable one being fairly huge.

It's hard to see LACS remaining a charity for too long. It's always been a dysfunctional organisation, with internal splits, chief execs 'taking advantage' of their position, chief execs and others seeing the light and changing sides, lousy financial control, mis-management of sanctuaries, etc etc etc. It's already fallen out with the Charity Commissioners several times for being 'party political'!

I'm surprised it was allowed to become a charity - its 'charitable objectives' - as stated below - don't seem to be getting much of a priority!!

"THE CHARITY'S OBJECTS ("THE OBJECTS") ARE THE ADVANCEMENT OF EDUCATION GENERALLY WITH PARTICULAR REFERENCE TO THE CARE AND PROTECTION OF ANIMALS, ECOLOGY, NATURAL HISTORY, CONSERVATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES; THE PREVENTION OF ALL FORMS OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS; THE CONSERVATION, PRESERVATION, PROTECTION AND RESTORATION FOR THE PUBLIC BENEFIT OF THE NATURAL RESOURCES, NATURAL BEAUTY AND ANIMAL AND PLANT LIFE OF THE WORLD AND LANDS AND BUILDINGS OF BEAUTY, HISTORIC INTEREST OR OF ECOLOGICAL OR SCIENTIFIC IMPORTANCE AND, AS REGARDS LANDS, FOR THE PRESERVATION, AS FAR AS IS PRACTICABLE, OF THEIR NATURAL ASPECT, FEATURES AND ANIMAL AND PLANT LIFE."

Don't see too much of THAT going on!:rolleyes:
 
LACS, as a charity, SUCK!

So they claim to be against blood sports and animal torture, and yet they cause the slow and agonising death of hundreds of death on their sanctuaries for little more than their own entertainment, and feeling like they've done good.

They mocked the Countryside Alliance using aging rock stars to publicise their cause, and then hired their own aged musical lackey.

They condone violence towards animals, and yet many who perpetrate violence towards animals and people do so in their name.

No point saying they're rubbish cos they have conflicting views. I'd support them if they went about it the right way. But as it is, I'd love to know what they're on that they think they can be taken seriously and that they're actually going anywhere!

Their political campaign was simply seducing the PM's wife.

*sigh*
 
Sl,considering i am disabled, in a wheel chair with a degenerating neurological disease i cannot see myself riding out"halfcut" as you say!you can report me as much as you like, you too have shown your true colours- so with that, you are on permanent iggy so i dont have to read your filth, abuse and **** anymore!! My body is knackered but my mind and brain are still ok so, to hell with you!

True colours Rosemary? You posted this to the savages on facebook. " I HAVE READ ON ANOTHER FORUM A MOST UNPLEASANTTIRADE ON ME, HECALLS HIMSELF SCRATCHLINE, VERY ANTI BUT NOT A SAB.HE IS A VILE CREATURE WHO ONLY ABUSES ME,NEVER MIND ALL THE OTHERS WHO ARE PRO HUNTING. MY POINT BEING, HE FOLLOWS MY EVERY WORD ON FACE BOOK SO DO NOT LET THESE CREEPS GET TO KNOW YOUR PRIVATE DETAILS, ELSE YOU WILL NOT GET PEACE."

Firstly I have not abused you as well you know! Secondly my problem is with all who want to see a return to hunting and killing with dogs. As I have already taken to task hundreds of pro hunters on fb dont think yourself so special please x
 
TROLL lurking IMO (and I don't meant the OP).

regardless of their POV the LACS or those associated with them have done nothing to help their own cause, what with the terrorist behvaiour and so on. As to their validity as a charitable organisation... I think that JG said it all earlier.
 
Scratchline, what you have just said proves you follow her on facebook, if you want to be an anti yet spend most of your time stalking the hunting forum being rude and unpleasant. IMO you have shown youre true colours, don not come on the hunting forum, slate people and not expect it to be thrown back at you because we're fighting for our tradition and past time, we dont need pathetic little creeps like you in our way. go grow some balls and f*** off back to the pit you come from, you;re not welcome here! just because you have 'taken to task hundreds of pro hunters' does not make you a bigger 'man' (not that you can be labelled as one), it makes you a sad little wierdo who has nothing better to do with thier tie. and i for one, would gladly put a brick round your face should you stalk me on facebook, let alone attack my horse whilst hunting with the rest of your vile, pestering little sad excuses for human beings known as antis. bet you never thought you'd get that of a 16 yr old girl.

Your illegal hobby has gone and you dont like it lol lol lol Never thought I would get a load of nonsense from a child on a forum?? Ive had much better posts and some pretty great threats so you keep hold of your brick. PMSL at you.

The fb pages are public so I can read what I like when I like thankyou and if you dont like my presence on my chosen forum you know what you can do!!
 
and how the h*** can you be so childish! dont count yourself as something special, no one gives a s*** about your opinion, SL. You alone will not be able to prevent a repeal of the hunting ban, to be honest i think it only fiar we legalize hunting vile people like you. i think we've seen the real you, a rude, insulting sad excuse for a human being. I think the fact you expect us to take you seriously is taking the mickey. facebook me if you want ;)

I dont doubt for a minute people like you would hunt just about anything or anyone, violent and bloodthirsty to the core.

Now if you wish to carry this on have the courage to pm me and save these nice people from your scary nature. lol lol lol lol lol lol lol
 
Top