Roody2
Well-Known Member
Before I start I would like to point out that I am not expressing my opinion of the events of this week or any previous welfare cases. I am just a little confused about something.
In 2007 the new Animal Welfare Act came into force which I seem to remember was billed by the RSPCA as enabling them to do more about the 'P' in their title - Prevention.
So why is it they cannot remove animals such as were seen this week in a speedier manner to prevent further suffering?
In 2007 the new Animal Welfare Act came into force which I seem to remember was billed by the RSPCA as enabling them to do more about the 'P' in their title - Prevention.
So why is it they cannot remove animals such as were seen this week in a speedier manner to prevent further suffering?