FfionWinnie
Well-Known Member
Is she unbacked, or was that under saddle?
No it was under saddle. I have owned and been riding her for 9 months. And there is nothing wrong with her back sack or crack, honest
Is she unbacked, or was that under saddle?

off topics but what a lovely amount if hi-vis nah and ned are wearing![]()
Otherwise someone's fantastically justifiable rear could then be passed on to someone who could easily and accidentally give the animal the aids for whatever fun party trick it can do, not realise it and end up completely freaking out theirselves, and the horse and potentially causing injury and even earning the horse a bad name which in the wrong hands that could mean some pretty undeserved discipline.
I think it's absolutely fine to teach your horse whatever the hell you like. Have it rearing, bucking, leaping or even doing Gangman Style if you want...IF...you are absolutely sure you're going to be keeping it for its entire life. Otherwise someone's fantastically justifiable rear could then be passed on to someone who could easily and accidentally give the animal the aids for whatever fun party trick it can do, not realise it and end up completely freaking out theirselves, and the horse and potentially causing injury and even earning the horse a bad name which in the wrong hands that could mean some pretty undeserved discipline. Sure it may not be the person you sell it to...but the person after, or the person after them.
Seen this happen several times before.
I am sure that JFTD's commands are far more specific than that.
JFTD, you can't deny that some people really DO show some spectacularly awful riding, and that is my point someone could end up with something who has been trained to do whatever it is, flail their arms and legs like drunken octopus and then the **** hits the fan.

If you planned to sell a horse that had been taught to rear, you would tell the buyer.
Surely this adds to its value.
Strangely I don't see horses taught to buck as that is generally put under a vice.