abbijay
Well-Known Member
I took BP out eventing last weekend, it's only now I've come down off the buzz of the XC to actually read my dressage sheet critically (beyond just being a touch 'nyeh' about the score) and, with very little experience of riding the BE tests I wondered if anyone could tell me a bit more about what they're after?
I came out of the test feeling pretty happy that, despite being on grass, it had all gone to plan so felt guaranteed a 60%+ score (I work on the basis that if we do all the movements in the right place at the right time it would be impossible to score less than a 6) and hoped to pick up quite a few extra marks along the way, without thinking BP had been showing his inner Va-Leg-Warmers to their true capacity (he has started doing unaff Novice tests with marks over 60%). He is a very genuine and accurate pony, as long as i remember to ask him, but being a purebred clydesdale he struggles with truly working from behind in a light and easy frame.
We scored a pleasing 36 but if this had been in pure dressage i would have expected higher and having looked at some of the comments I can see "6, could be rounder over the back". The test we rode (BE91) is easier than any prelim I've done and I thought that things like self carriage and roundness would be less important than accuracy and obedience.
So eventers out there: is your dressage marked more stringently than pure dressage or was the judge just completely jealous that I own the best horse in the world and she doesn't?
P.S. I don't care too much, we still came away with a nice big orange 5th place rosette and for a bumbling, riding school nervous novice and her cart horse I feel it is a thoroughly respectable result!
I came out of the test feeling pretty happy that, despite being on grass, it had all gone to plan so felt guaranteed a 60%+ score (I work on the basis that if we do all the movements in the right place at the right time it would be impossible to score less than a 6) and hoped to pick up quite a few extra marks along the way, without thinking BP had been showing his inner Va-Leg-Warmers to their true capacity (he has started doing unaff Novice tests with marks over 60%). He is a very genuine and accurate pony, as long as i remember to ask him, but being a purebred clydesdale he struggles with truly working from behind in a light and easy frame.
We scored a pleasing 36 but if this had been in pure dressage i would have expected higher and having looked at some of the comments I can see "6, could be rounder over the back". The test we rode (BE91) is easier than any prelim I've done and I thought that things like self carriage and roundness would be less important than accuracy and obedience.
So eventers out there: is your dressage marked more stringently than pure dressage or was the judge just completely jealous that I own the best horse in the world and she doesn't?
P.S. I don't care too much, we still came away with a nice big orange 5th place rosette and for a bumbling, riding school nervous novice and her cart horse I feel it is a thoroughly respectable result!