Galupy
Well-Known Member
'Dog guardian' is another one used in the council area we visit in the USA.
Actually, around these parts we prefer it if you refer to them by the term "dog children" which is by far the most correct term available.
Thank you.
'So if I do not 'own' my dog and it is not my 'property' hey, he can go and live with someone else if he feels like it, or someone can take him away from here, because I cannot 'own' him - RIGHT?!
That would be the logical conclusion from non-ownership wouldn't it? Some groups might try to get changed but they will have a long fight on their hands. Dogs being considered property makes their owners very liable for what they do. I can't see that changing for the purpose of being PC ..