Muddywellies
Well-Known Member
As title. I'm, erm, intreagued. Is she a rider, or trainer. What are her credentials ??
She's a stirrer, because I think it how she makes money, through FB ads and sponsors and clicks and her blog. She's also aggressively litigious.a few of her videos appear on my social media. Some of them are the standard ‘horrible dressage’ that are all over the internet and they should be seen and criticised. But some of her opinions on people do seem to be overly harsh and unfounded. She posted a video of Charlotte Dujardin riding a young horse at a demo and rounded on her for no reason. I think she re-posted a slightly nicer video later.
She certainly likes the sound of her own voice !She's a stirrer, because I think it how she makes money, through FB ads and sponsors and clicks and her blog. She's also aggressively litigious.
I wonder how the recent FEI ban on not any other event video than their own, with permission, will affect her?
It is not that she's difficult or a campaigner she is just generally not a very nice person and often passes off other work/videos as her own.Campaigners, especially those at the forefront, are often difficult people. Without these difficult people change would be even harder.
It is not that she's difficult or a campaigner she is just generally not a very nice person and often passes off other work/videos as her own.
It is not that she's difficult or a campaigner she is just generally not a very nice person and often passes off other work/videos as her own.
I don’t have a problem with her being difficult but she seems to pick on things just to make fun of people . I agree any abuse should be publicised , but a photo of a moment in time is not necessarily showing how the horse has gone for the rest of the test.. videos show much more and are more reliable
What does being neurodiverse have to do with Dressage Hub? She doesn't accidentally step over lines because she's neurodiverse or sensitive or whatever. She just likes getting views from being vile to people it's not an animal welfare thing with her.Highly sensitive persons often create change, neurodiverse people often create change, and we know what flack Greta gets for what are mostly immutable character traits. There is a downside to all aspects of our personalities.
If you're the sort of person that does create change, you're likely to also get backs up, regularly. Not defending what she's doing (don't follow closely) but I just think it's inevitable that they step over lines, regularly.
You make some very interesting and thought provoking points.I get it, but we're criticising her for the downside of what is her fundamental skill set ie creating change. People like her get it wrong quite a lot, i'ts inevitable because they don't see the world like most of us. Most of us wouldn't be able to do what people like her do, the time, the passion, the energy, the backlash. To be able to withstand that she has to be a certain type of character.
Some people will agree with most of what she prints, might not agree that she should have posted it, but will agree with its content, and she'll p**s people off, repeatedly, and in this day and age will say that half of what she does works against her. Just like JSO. When you see pictures of Charlotte leaning back, being really strong on a horse's mouth, especially a young horse, then some criticism may be valid. We keep only banning the very worst, the most public of crimes - eg. a strict definition of LDR with time limits in the warm up arena, and we all know how much riders are able to get around that, HOW many years down the line? Drawing a broader brush will feel right to many, voices have been silenced too long. It's no surprise that some of the publicity, the criticism, goes OTT, but then again, "OTT" is different for everyone.
Highly sensitive persons often create change, neurodiverse people often create change, and we know what flack Greta gets for what are mostly immutable character traits. There is a downside to all aspects of our personalities.
If you're the sort of person that does create change, you're likely to also get backs up, regularly. Not defending what she's doing (don't follow closely) but I just think it's inevitable that they step over lines, regularly.
Oh and specifically, many people can watch a video and think the work looks okay, photos are incredibly valuable to expose what is going on in the millisecond. Usually there are a whole load of stills and video taken across a fair time period showing it's not a moment in time.
Someone once commented on one of her posts and she disagreed with the comment so found out where the poster worked and kept bombarding the work with e-mails about it.She rips them to pieces under the guise of trying to enact change.
She’s been banned from major shows in Florida for several years now. Not because she’s calling people out for abusive riding, but because she has literally caused riders to be stalked and harassed over a bad photo.
While what she does COULD be to get people to clean up their act, that’s not what she’s about.
Someone once commented on one of her posts and she disagreed with the comment so found out where the poster worked and kept bombarding the work with e-mails about it.
Her original group got taken down/hacked so this new group only has the posts on it about bad training which hides how bad she used to be.
Colour me entirely unsurprised. Nothing that is posted on that page is really posted to further horse welfare, everything she does is either to attack people she has a vendetta against or to make money.Who would thought it? Two of the most toxic influencers appear to have a tie-up.
Astonish hypocrisy by DHO to ignore the viral video of Dickinson's abusive riding.
And people who still have money ticking our of their accounts for DHO's now archived subscribers group might take a moment to cancel.