Bettyboo222
Well-Known Member
Now that is the best laugh of the night.
I really did wonder!![]()
When signing in for a show a few weeks ago I acidently wrote '****land' instead of 'shetland'
Now that is the best laugh of the night.
I really did wonder!![]()
I just find it strange that people post things about their 'oldies' doing well for their age at the age of 19, 20, etc etc and then commenting that they are on bute, partially retired for the last five years and the owners are considering fully retiring them!! I can understand that it depends on each individual horse and previous injury etc etc - but so many people seem to think that just because their horse has reached an older age that they must be semi or fully retired, which IMO is the worst thing for them.
![]()
Surely everyone (animals included) is an individual and where some will be like spring chickens in their dotage, others will have needed to slow down substantially whilst still being able to maintain a good quality of life... Plenty of us are on daily cocktails of medications and less physically able than we'd like to be at a given age but can still have a blast and enjoy living... I don't see that competing up until the last breath is necessarily better or healthier than a retirement...
As I put in my OP - I understand every horse is an individual and some will have health issues which restricts them and means they have to slow down.
I was talking about healthy old horses which have no issues being retired 'just' because they are getting older. IMO it is the worst thing that can be done for a horse and I see so many older horses who deteriorate when they get retired.
but surely that is the individual owners choice? perhaps the horse has told them in other ways that they are not happy doing the level of work required, a horse doesn't always have to be hanging lame to find work hard
I think i would rather see a sound elderly horse retired in a field than an unsound elderly horse buted up to the eyeballs just so it can carry on working.
I suppose people aren't getting my meaning here - I will try to clarify - if someone has a 15 year old horse who is perfectly healthy and sound, no issues and has been in full work - be that competing or just hacking - why would someone just decide to suddenly retire them?
I have heard so many people say that they must start slowing their horse's work down and retire them soon simply because they are '19', or 'in their twenties', yet there is nothing wrong with the horse whatsoever.
Each to their own - I just think it's a kin to old people who sit in a chair day after day and do nothing 'just because they are old'. It's far better for them to get exercise and keep moving.
Agree, when an older horse tells you theyre not coping with their workload you listen and change it until you cant ride them or do inhand stuff anymore, then imo theyre either maintained on field retirement or pts, whatever is best for them