ihatework
Well-Known Member
That makes a lot of senseHaving experience with a different charity they were moving towards unridden homes for a variety of reasons. Many of their 'unridden companions' would be fine to ride. However in times when charity donations are plummeting they had had to cut back on staff, and the staff capable of riding, breaking, schooling and assessing suitability were at the top of the list as those activities were a luxury rather than required for basic care. They also spent a lot of time matching horses with suitable riding homes (we all know how honest people are when describing their abilities!) which required more staff with experience in this specific area, plus horses were with the charity for longer before being rehomed wjich equals more cost. In addition they were finding that when people had problems with a horse (minor schooling issues - the sort that require a bit of patience and some sessions with a good instructor) there was an inclination just to send the horse back rather than the loaner trying to resolve them, as you would if you actually owned the horse. So they were getting a lot of the ridden horses returned.
So for a lot of reasons it is an awful easier/cheaper in both time and money to rehome as non ridden, in a time when charities are scrabbling for the pennies.