Cinnamontoast
Fais pas chier!
I've spoken to a very well known vet from a vet hospital in the area and his advise (strong advise) is to worm count and only worm for what you have, instead you will build up resistance. He suspects that mine already have resistance hence the high counts.
Not my area, then! The vet hospital here has said worm using various wormers. My own vets disagree strongly and say only worm when WEC come back showing worms.
I strongly disagree. That would mean my vet would control my worming program and I simply don't think they have sufficient experience. (I appreciate some people won't like that arrogant attitude)
I don't think that's arrogant at all. I refuse to listen to vets about nutrition or worming. They just don't have the training. A poster on here who has a parisitologist friend says her mate advises using WEC and only using wormers if need is demonstrated. How can a bet possibly countermand this?! And how come three of my vets think the RVC worming programme is totally wrong? (Maybe cos they've done more study on the issue?)
When I had the facilities to do my own easily I used them but don't pay for them as it would only remove 1/2 of the treatments I do a year, plus if you are jabbing for mites (as I think you might CT) that kind of covers at least another one too!
I haven't needed to jab for mites for years, not since I stuck him on straw.
The solution is to ensure that each and every poo is picked up from a paddock/field each day every day. That way you will dramatically reduce the worm burden.
Yet Westgate labs said to me on Facebook the other day that this isn't actually essential and that treating the individual horse according to its needs is far more important.