Would you use this farrier?

martlin

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 December 2008
Messages
7,649
Location
Lincs
www.martlinequestrian.co.uk
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Yes but the angle of the foot is better in the first pics, its just the quality of the horn that is not as good, this can be helped with a hoof product or biotin ect.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agree 100%
smile.gif


[/ QUOTE ]

I'm in 2 minds about that... We don't see the photos from the same angle to start with AND the horse was sound and working well and then started to have problems...
It's all very good getting the angles better etc, but if it doesn't keep the horse sound and comfortable
confused.gif
crazy.gif
 

charlie76

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 March 2006
Messages
4,665
Visit site
Just had a quick read of the orginial post and unless I am reading it wrong the horse isn't lame now, he was a while ago with bruised feet. The owner just isn't happy with how the horse has been shod.
IMO once the quality of the horn is sorted the horse has a far better chance of staying sound long term with how the feet look now rather than how they looked before.
 

martlin

Well-Known Member
Joined
3 December 2008
Messages
7,649
Location
Lincs
www.martlinequestrian.co.uk
[ QUOTE ]
Just had a quick read of the orginial post and unless I am reading it wrong the horse isn't lame now, he was a while ago with bruised feet. The owner just isn't happy with how the horse has been shod.
IMO once the quality of the horn is sorted the horse has a far better chance of staying sound long term with how the feet look now rather than how they looked before.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fair enough... You see as I read it, the horse has been having constant problems since the apprentice started shoeing.

My advice still would be to take it up with main farrier, request him to shoe personally if the OP is not keen on the apprentice.
 

charlie76

Well-Known Member
Joined
27 March 2006
Messages
4,665
Visit site
I agree with speaking to the farrier and I wouldn't be happy with the apprentice doing the horse unsupervised, however, conformation wise they have made an improvement.
I would be more upset if the horses feet looked like they do in the 2nd pic.
I don't usually join in on these posts but having lost a horse at 7 yrs old to navicular with upright boxy feet I am obsessed with feet.
 

Flame_

Well-Known Member
Joined
15 November 2007
Messages
8,145
Location
Merseyside
Visit site
OK, I think the feet looked better before, although they were at that time lacking heel support. If the horse had/has weak feet and it could have been landing heavily on its heels if its been having lameness problems, this is more likely to be the reason the feet look rough now than a current bad shoeing job, if that makes sense.

The farrier should have given a bit more heel support sooner, but he's at least doing it now. Otherwise I still think the problem's due to poor hoof quality and conformation.
 

Kenzo

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 February 2008
Messages
13,929
Location
Yorkshire
Visit site
Was your farrier fully supervising the apprentice when he shod your horse on the few occassions that he did him?
 

Delta99

Well-Known Member
Joined
10 January 2009
Messages
323
Visit site
No, the farrier was not supervising the apprentice and when I complained, he told me that the 'apprentice' was fully qualified. Also told me that feet had simply changed shape. To me, feet do not change without a reason.
And the second picture is taken from above so it's a different angle but I can assure you guys the feet were never 'boxy'! But at that point the heel was starting to get a bit better.
I will give the farrier a call to see what he says but in the meantime I have a different farrier coming out to do my new boy and will ask his opinion - with any luck he'll do a good job with the new boy and I can change to him.
Horse reacted to biotin, by the way, all 4 legs were like tree trunks, is there any alternatives?
 

Kenzo

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 February 2008
Messages
13,929
Location
Yorkshire
Visit site
I would be checking if the 'apprentice' was registered at the time, because if he wasn't he should not of been shoeing the horse (despite if he made a good or bad job) unless he was under close supervision.
If that is the case then no I would not be using that farrier, as he's not practicing how he should be, not only that he'd be a lair.

Hopefully that was not the case, besides its in the past now but my point is I'd want a farrier I can trust, I would get a second opinion on the matter but also discuss things with your current farrier so he also has a chance to explain things, no point running off to another farrier with half the story, if you know what I mean, otherwise its not fair.

I'm no farrier so I can't give any opinions on how the feet have been shod or for what reasons your current farrier has done them like that so would be unfair of me to comment on weather to continue with him or not.

Hope you get things resolved though.
smile.gif
 

Kenzo

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 February 2008
Messages
13,929
Location
Yorkshire
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
Cournucresine is like a miracle cream in my experience,just slap it on ever day and the changes are surprisingly quick

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree, it's an oldy but a goldy, swear by biotin in the food as well, my horse had really crap feet when I got him, takes a while to turn them around but it does work.
smile.gif
 

Taffster

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 July 2008
Messages
1,993
Location
West Yorkshire
Visit site
Apparently as the hoof takes approx 12 months to grow farriers formula would take a similar length of time to see a real improvement. He does seem to have quite poor feet on the first piccies, my tb also had poor feet however they always looked like they had been shod when the farrier had been. I'd probably go back to farriers formula (gold label do a cheaper version which i found was good) and have a word with your farrier in regards to what can be done to improve the current situation
 

lannerch

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 July 2008
Messages
3,582
Location
Shropshire
Visit site
In answer to the original posters question NO I certainly would not.

I am surprised so many think it is a good job out of a bad situation.

If the foot is poor why is the farrier cramming 4 nails in! If he was more skilled 3 strategically higher placed nails would do the job better and cause less damage to the hoof wall.

Also if you run you hand down the side of the hoof is it a smooth fit, or can you feel too easily where the shoe is nailed onto the hoof.

That shoe to me does not look as if it fits the hoof and that is not including the fact the toe overlaps at the front!
 

destiny11

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 March 2008
Messages
637
Visit site
Can't see anything wrong with the shoeing tbh, shoe set back to help with breakover. Must say quite shocked at the amount of posters who say it is bad shoeing
confused.gif
 

spaniel

Well-Known Member
Joined
21 March 2002
Messages
8,277
Visit site
Im surprised too!

The quality of the hoof isnt that clever but the farrier has IMO shod well for a horse with flat feet. The heels are well supported, the walls are well supported and the breakover is beneficial to the tendons. Not the tidiest job but not awful.

If the apprentice did this unsupervised I wouldnt be happy but as an actual job its ok.
 

MistletoeMegan

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 August 2006
Messages
3,255
Location
Suffolk
Visit site
QR - for those who think it's such a bad job that you wouldn't use the farrier again, what don't you like about it?

Do you prefer the 'before' feet?
 

lannerch

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 July 2008
Messages
3,582
Location
Shropshire
Visit site
I have answered that above however to furthur clarify [image]
03062009.jpg
[/image] I have posted an example imo of a well shod foot by a decent farrier, again a flat footed Tb with poor hoof quality, ie similar problems to op horse.
 

destiny11

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 March 2008
Messages
637
Visit site
I am sorry but the first one you have posted imo is awful, too long in the toe and no heel support
frown.gif


Edited too say - 2nd one - no heel support at all, shoe looks too small
frown.gif
 

MistletoeMegan

Well-Known Member
Joined
11 August 2006
Messages
3,255
Location
Suffolk
Visit site
[ QUOTE ]
the farrier went to the olympics carry on experts!

[/ QUOTE ]

Not sure why you're beginning to get a bit of a funny tone?

But, why do you think they're good feet?

That's why my post was asking - if people have different opinions of what constitutes a well-shod foot, why do they hold that opinion?
 

destiny11

Well-Known Member
Joined
28 March 2008
Messages
637
Visit site
I am sorry but to me it looks like one is longer in the toe than the other, no need to get snotty, I have an opinion, so do you
grin.gif
grin.gif
grin.gif
 

lannerch

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 July 2008
Messages
3,582
Location
Shropshire
Visit site
Read my post earlier!

The farrier is very well known remedial farrier who did go to beijing I still cannot believe you think the op posters shoeing is good are you a troll inwhich case I fell for it hook line and sinker.
 

lannerch

Well-Known Member
Joined
19 July 2008
Messages
3,582
Location
Shropshire
Visit site
sorry it really is my camera angle and the fact I am on unlevel ground no not getting snotty

horse is a devil for pulling off his front shoes with his back so I am thankful the shoe is no longer! (pernamently wears overeach boots but still manages ) lanky legs and short back!
 
Top