FlyingCircus
Well-Known Member
I do too, and if I think it could be workable to restore it then that would be my preference. It hasn't had anyone living in it for over a year and the mould is...well, intense It has damp, mould, subsidence, to name a few issues.I'm going to go against the grain here and say that I don't think it's right to demolish a historic house and rebuild a modern one in its place unless the house is completely derelict (in which case it would be classed as abandoned and you may struggle to get planning permission if it is in open countryside and outside of the local plan settlement boundary).
If you can afford to demolish a house and build a new one, why not just buy an empty plot with planning and leave the old cottage to someone who would want to restore it? I think that old buildings are an important part of our country's heritage.
Sometimes sadly it is just not economical to try and restore a structure that is on the way out through lack of maintenance. I think it better to rebuild a building in it's likeness on the plot, which is able to be used and maintained rather than it be left to ruin.
It isn't listed and isn't in a conservation area, so those parts aren't particularly problematic. We are well versed with listed buildings though and both would have preferred to buy an older building that meets our needs, but there just aren't any out there at the moment (I keep checking ).