julie111
Well-Known Member
It's called Cryptorchid and can become cancerous if left. If previous owner won't help with costs and insurance won't pay I would definitely thinking about having him pts.
I suspect the contract may be void because both parties acted on an incorrect assumption, i.e. that the horse was a rig. You need a good equine solicitor.
What I do find a bit odd is that the seller claims the castration was "not done professionally". I thought all invasive surgical procedures on horses had to be done by a vet?
Have a read up of this, it may be worth giving them a call and seeing where you stand. http://www.edmondsonhall.com/page/1r6ef/Home/partner.htmlHi all,
I'm just after some opinions, which would be really helpful right now. A few months ago I paid a fair price for a young "gelding". The owner seemed lovely, and was keen to find him a good home. He appeared safe, sane, and fitted the bill, so he came home. The yard he was sold from was very quiet, and he was on individual turnout. His only stated vice was being a little strong, which I figured was neither here nor there.
On arrival home he became a bit of a handful, bucking and rearing on the ground, vocal and stressy. I assumed he needed time to settle. Due to a change in circumstances I moved him closer to home a month later, so the settling period started again. He spent a lot of time pacing fence lines, dominating the other geldings (inclusive of mounting them), calling to mares, generally tarting around and even tried throwing himself over a stable door (mare the other side) on a couple of occasions. He was appearing more and more stallion-y, so I opted to blood test him.
The tests came back showing huge amounts of hormones. Scans and such later have deemed that the only way to find the offending part would be surgery, at a 4-figure price. This is obviously assuming that the retained testicle can be found, as it was nowhere to be seen on the scans. The vet was certain it's lodged high in his abdomen somewhere.
Now the old owner claims that she didn't know he was rig, however she has made it fairly clear that she was aware of his riggy behaviour prior to the sale. She had him on RigCalm (allegedly to no effect), and found he was better behaved when kept away from mares, but neglected to disclose any of this information before the deal was done. She claimed he was submissive, very friendly and was gelded prior to her owning him.
My question: WWYD? He's a lovely boy who is well behaved ridden (he'll start sweet talking mares, calling and showing off given the chance, but with a firm rider that's all it amounts to), but he can be a handful on the ground and I'm a little concerned. Obviously we haven't hit spring yet, so I don't know the full extent of his behaviour. Do you persevere and take the brunt of a large vet bill / possible liability on your hands, or do you call quits before anyone gets hurt?
Any replies appreciate, my head is running circles at the minute. Thanks.
It's called Cryptorchid and can become cancerous if left. If previous owner won't help with costs and insurance won't pay I would definitely thinking about having him pts.
Seems a bit of a overreaction having him PTS surely? Sounds more like he just needs proper management and handling - he needs to learn some manners on the ground and really to be kept away from mares. It sounds like surgery maybe won't be as expensive as OP is thinking. However, I'd be wary of going down this route if scans have not managed to pinpoint where or if there even is a retained testicle. I would be tempted to try a supplement route first to see if this helps him a bit and makes him easier to handle. Maybe Regumate or similar as someone suggested (isn’t it raised oestrogen levels they test for in Rigs anyway, not testosterone? Maybe that’s wrong but I am sure it’s something like that and not what you would assume).
Speak to your vet in more detail as to what your options are (that is if you wish to keep him anyway).
OP, do contact your local Trading Standards Office on Monday before you have to pay for expensive legal advice. Depending on where you are, they can be very helpful and might even take up your case. It's worth a try.
If you do go down the op route, as a previous poster said - shop around. I put off having a lump removed from my cat as the amount my vet quoted was very high. Moved to another county and the vet there quote a third of the previous vet's price. I had assumed that all vets prices were roughly the same.
Keep those emails. Speak to an equine solicitor. You were miss sold a horse. If you are a BHS gold member, call their helpline.
She withheld information which to me is very pertinent. A rig can be a dangerous horse in the wrong hands and if you are not experienced enough to deal with it, she should not have knowingly sold him to you without disclosing that information.
I'm reluctant to move, to be honest, as I love the yard.
I think we are jumping the gun, the horse is not as sold, it should go back not be moved to a yard to suit it, if any such yard exists, with vacancies, yards willing to take problem horses may have their own problems!You're in a rotten situation, and I do feel for you, but this statement rather jumped off the page. If you do decide to keep and manage this horse, it doesn't really matter how much you love the yard if it isn't the right environment for him. I've been in that situation - a yard I loved, and a yard owner who is a very dear friend. It broke my heart to leave, but I had no choice as I had to do the right thing for my horse.
I think we are jumping the gun, the horse is not as sold, it should go back not be moved to a yard to suit it, if any such yard exists, with vacancies, yards willing to take problem horses may have their own problems!
Whether or not she wants to give horse back she should certainly make an immediate effort to find out if this is an option......... to my mind she has bought a horse which is not as sold, she has bought a problem horse. She is looking at a lot of costs [unknown amount] which she could use for other reasons, like purchasing a horse that does what it says on the tin.Yes - but the OP is looking at various options, so your statement that the horse must go back could equally be seen as jumping the gun. I don't see where she has stated that she wants to give the horse back!