skewbald_again
Well-Known Member
I agree with this. Less students will be beneficial, if I hear the phrase "degrees are worthless" one more time, I may go mad! I just feel that using money to do it isn't the best way. No matter what happens, someone gets hurt. I hope one day there will be a far better system in place. One that isn't elitist in terms of money or "class", but keeps the standards high.
As I see it, University places should be limited to the top 10 - 20 % academically, for everyone else, real training and workplace education should be improved. Does anyone who remembers the old system really think Equine Degrees were ever really *necessary*?
If you qualify to go to University, and your family earns over (x) thousand pounds, they pay for you to go. If they have paid for 13 years of private school, they can pay for three more years, no questions asked.
If your family is truly poor, you should be fully funded.
In between those two extremes, there should be a sliding scale.
It should NOT be beyond us to devise systems which adjust for the advantages some people have over others - we should be fully capable of detecting that the girl from an inner city estate with a B in Biology, is doing better than the lad from Eton with the same grade. It is not, as they say, rocket science.
Anyone funded by the public purse in any way shape or form, who behaves like those animals on tv this evening, should be immediately sent down, and forced to pay back every penny they have. Those post graduates and lecturers taking part should be stripped of their degrees and serve a prison sentence. It's bloody bonkers.