A little tale I heard today...

[Fantasy_World]

Gawd that is just being pedantic and sarcastic

Why not just answer any questions that have been asked by other HHO's in relation to your post or at least try to give a valid reason for posting the 'so-called' information, instead of retaliating with childish replies?

 

[vicijp]

Ive answered all i am prepared to.
My reason for posting is beacuse I wanted to.
I am trying to think of an answer for the last rediculous post, but everytime I try to read it properly I go cross-eyed.

 

[ReadyTeddy]

am just thinking that it seems to me that as with another recent thread this has started getting nasty not particularly from what the original poster said but because someone else was dumb enough to mention names, even though in this case it wasnt a mother jumping to erroneous conclusions but just speculating on the original post.
as i said before on other occasions it is foolish and arrogant to assume that everyone on here is 12 years old, knows nothing and hs a 'my little pony doll' instead of a real horse so either comment on original with out naming names, use a PM or talk to admin. i have already been sickened by the behaviour of a forum member jumping to conclusions this week and their subsequent behaviour no matter how much they think they are justified, lets have no more of it.
personaly i dont believe the original ost at this point but the poster may be right and she is entitled on a forum to post 'rumours' to seek confirmation.

 

[Flame_]

Give vicijp a break. She just told of some random horse abuse that reminds us it goes on. When names are involved it gives a clearer picture and I'm all for it. People's reputations will be tested and those who have done good jobs will get support - look at Kelly Marks. One person makes an abuse accusation, ten or so rubbish it Kelly comes out of it looking great. Sod the lawyers truth will prevail!