blackcob
🖖
Our breed club recently lobbied the KC to have an additional health test recorded - one that members had committed to testing for under the code of ethics for a good while, and the club was maintaining their own records of results, but wanted it logged and appearing on the DNA tests on MyKC. Turned down as there was no evidence that it was a significant problem in the breed. Because they had tested and not let it become one...?! That's two health tests now on my dog that the KC have no interest in recording, but they'd be happy to take the money on the litter registrations if he were used.
So, the KC are a shower of shite at the best of times and I'm loathe to offer any defense really but here I don't think she has, strictly speaking, done anything they don't permit. As mentioned upthread it's very much in their interest for people to breed in volume! Not in their remit if the bitches have had additional litters, so long as she hasn't tried to register them. I've seen a lot of people appalled at their accepting dogs for registration with such high COI but I believe that's a wider problem in cockers anyway, I've been shocked before by the level of line breeding and use of popular sires that seems to be accepted in some circles.
So, the KC are a shower of shite at the best of times and I'm loathe to offer any defense really but here I don't think she has, strictly speaking, done anything they don't permit. As mentioned upthread it's very much in their interest for people to breed in volume! Not in their remit if the bitches have had additional litters, so long as she hasn't tried to register them. I've seen a lot of people appalled at their accepting dogs for registration with such high COI but I believe that's a wider problem in cockers anyway, I've been shocked before by the level of line breeding and use of popular sires that seems to be accepted in some circles.
