Amputation - is this really ethical??

i saw a programme a while ago of an elephant with a prosthetic limb.....it could lead a "normal" captive ()! life........it looked happy and well loved...

i woudlnt do it to MY horse though.....their flight instinct is compromised.... and to me a horse should always be able to react...in the wild if it broke its leg/severed etc it would die.....therefore to me its going totally against nature (same with the elephant sadly..)!
 
http://www.equinewobblers.com/other_surgeries/amputation.html

Sorry but I am of the opinion that if it were my horse that required amputation it would be farewell.

What do you think?

Only in America eh? lol
i'm not saying I would but as we know not that long ago (15-20 years maybe) when a horse broke its leg it was PTS. Veterinary science and medicine has come on leaps and bounds in a short space of time and it needs trials like this to move even further. I don't see a problem with the prosthetic leg provided the horse is happy and the owner can afford the necessary up keep. Ok the animal is being used a guinea pig but at least it’s been given a chance of a relatively normal life. The prosthetic limb might not work and ultimately the animal might have to be PTS but at least they tried....providing it didn't suffer in the process
 
Last edited:
Oft! Personally I don't think I would go that far. I would imagine that horse will have a very restricted life after his amputation? I'm not sure I would want that for any horse of mine, not that I wouldn't want to do everything I could to save them. Just no to this.
 
As we know notthat long ago (15-20 years maybe) when a horse broke its leg it was PTS.Veterinary science and medicine has come on leaps and bounds in a shortspace of time and it needs trials like this to move even further. I don't see aproblem with the prosthetic leg provided the horse is happy and the owner canafford the necessary up keep. Ok the animal is being used a guinea pigbut at least it’s been given a chance of a relatively normal life. The prostheticlimb might not work and ultimately the animal might have to be PTS but at leastthey tried....providing it didn't suffer in the process



but it also begs the question - WHY keep the horse alive??? its no use with a fake leg....!!.... cant be ridden - WHO is choosing to keep the horse on the planet!?

of course.........us, the human - selfish as per usual...!

(i agree tho about vet science moving forward.........however i do think the statement "just because you CAN fix it dosent mean you SHOULD applies.......
 
but it also begs the question - WHY keep the horse alive??? its no use with a fake leg....!!.... cant be ridden - WHO is choosing to keep the horse on the planet!?

of course.........us, the human - selfish as per usual...!

(i agree tho about vet science moving forward.........however i do think the statement "just because you CAN fix it dosent mean you SHOULD applies.......

This has hit the nail on the head.. us humans are selfish!!
 
i'm not saying I would but as we know not that long ago (15-20 years maybe) when a horse broke its leg it was PTS. Veterinary science and medicine has come on leaps and bounds in a short space of time and it needs trials like this to move even further. I don't see a problem with the prosthetic leg provided the horse is happy and the owner can afford the necessary up keep. Ok the animal is being used a guinea pigbut at least it’s been given a chance of a relatively normal life. The prosthetic limb might not work and ultimately the animal might have to be PTS but at least they tried....providing it didn't suffer in the process

I agree - whilst it's something I wouldn't choose for my own, all these medical breakthroughs have to start somewhere.
I imagine the first few horses who weren't PTS when their legs were broken had owners who were criticized.
 
It is difficult.... I agree with 'just because you can it doesn't mean you should', but then 'you don't know unless you try'.

Totally agree about the human being selfish but what if as a result of the trial something was to develop that was of some use and benefit to the animal.
 
As for the whole "horse would not be useful, just a field ornament" thing, I've just asked to be given first refusal on a polo pony when he's eventually retired/sold and I'm half expecting to be buying a field ornament. But I love this horse and don't want to see him go to another home. So I'll deal with it, and the fact that I may not be able to ride him doesn't mean that I would love him less than a ridden horse.
 
As for the whole "horse would not be useful, just a field ornament" thing, I've just asked to be given first refusal on a polo pony when he's eventually retired/sold and I'm half expecting to be buying a field ornament. But I love this horse and don't want to see him go to another home. So I'll deal with it, and the fact that I may not be able to ride him doesn't mean that I would love him less than a ridden horse.

The very fact that I love my horse is why I would never do this to him.
 
Since the weight ratio is 60:40 forelegs to hindlegs, the weight on that prosthesis is 30% of the horse. How are you going to stop that from getting sore and breaking down?

It's not a road I'd go down.
 
Actually no, not only in America. The first horse in England to have a prosthetic limb was way back in 2001 http://www.oandp.com/articles/news_2002-09-27_01.asp

I wouldn't have it done but everyone makes different choices and medical advances are only made when we have people who do decide to make those different choices from the masses.

I took a horse to the vet in question when the 3 legged horse was there, the vet I spoke to about wasn't happy about the situation at all but they went through with it as the owner insisted & said if they didn't do it she would find somebody who would. I asked about his quality of life & she said it was pretty poor.
 
I took a horse to the vet in question when the 3 legged horse was there, the vet I spoke to about wasn't happy about the situation at all but they went through with it as the owner insisted & said if they didn't do it she would find somebody who would. I asked about his quality of life & she said it was pretty poor.

Perhaps. I was pointing out that this doesn't just happen in America. As far as I remember the English horse lived for many more years after his amputation.
 
Top