Lois Lame
Well-Known Member
One thing that has put me off some of the western trainers is how long they think it's OK to sit on a young and recently backed horse for. There was a clinic described on here a couple of years back where there was a 3 hour session and someone was expected to be on the horse's back for that entire time, using it as a seat to watch the others when they were not themselves doing an exercise. A friend goes to a very experienced Western trainer and was happy to be told that this expert had sat on her 4 year old for 3 hours while he was training other people, to teach it to stand quiet while things were going on around it.
There doesn't seem to be enough understanding in the Western riding world that standing still with a weight on its back is not effortless for a horse and needs just a much conditioning as moving around does. Or am I generalising from too small a sample?
Great post. I think it would be more difficult for a horse to stand still under a rider than to be walking.
And yet when I first bought a horse, in 1981, they were described as "aged" after 8 years and lost value from 10 years onwards because of the short length of time it was expected they would stay in work. It was impossible to insure a 15 year old, they were deemed too high risk.
My understanding for calling a horse 'aged' when over the age of 8 was due to the difficulty of accurately assessing a horse's age after that age.