smolmaus
Well-Known Member
I can imagine it pretty easily tbh. If it ain't broke (yet), don't fix it, eh? The "they are valued athletes and therefore must get the best of everything" doesn't really hold up to me. These horses are, what, 1/100,000 athletes, probably even a larger ratio. They can obviously cope and do well with that musculature but that doesn't mean it is necessarily optimal for them either? They could perform better, or be sound for longer, if they didn't have that strange dip. How do we know?And I can't imagine the top level of the sport being told the horse has atrophy and not doing anything to change it when muscle atrophy would mean poorer performance.
If it is primarily a saddle fit issue, as people seem to be suggesting, a physio might not have a lot of influence over that and has to just do their best with the situation in front of them.
Personally, I think it is odd, and it worth having a conversation about it. People posting their own horses and bragging about how they have a better topline than a 5* eventer is all a bit cringe tho.