Errin Paddywack
Well-Known Member
Poor chap, no wonder he was so stressed. I think he is going to be a total sweetheart once settled and knowing his place in the world. I think you may have got yourself a bargain.
If I was the dealer I would be fuming especially if I had read this thread and I would be pursuing Jasmine. I cannot see anything in the advert that is a lie or even misleading. I think Ozzy had been ridden by a 10yo I read somewhere so mother and daughter share is OK.You can argue it either way (as with most things) but if I were arguing for the current owner, I would be framing:
A person with physical and mental health problems has bought a horse on the basis that it was advertised as an RDA candidate, and then discovered that only a week earlier it was advertised at a sale as green and requiring a confident rider to bring back into work.
I don't think I'd have a problem taking that line, if a return and refund was sought.
What would be more difficult is to return and refund on a vet issue as the buyer elected not to have it vetted before the purchase. So if it is a refund situation, I'd rely on the unsuitability argument.
Personally though, I'd hold onto the horse if all is well vet wise, because I think it's very cute.
Devine is a horse dealer, that is how he makes his living. He saw a suitable horse, bought it and advertised it. Full stop. Many horse dealers do the same. He did't buy the horse as a pet to keep so obviously he put him up for sale. I'm not sure what difference the timing makes. If he collected Ozzie on the 24th then on that day or the 25th he must have got the girl riding and taken pics so after a day at the sales and rehoused Ozzie was perfectly manageable and per his video apparently easy to tack up.I found Ozzy on the auction website. He was sold on the 24th May and then Devine put him up for sale on the 25th absolutely disgusting.
It's business some people just don't have the emotional attachment to animals but do run a business.I found Ozzy on the auction website. He was sold on the 24th May and then Devine put him up for sale on the 25th absolutely disgusting.
They might be regulated but the thought of any animal of mine going through that turns my stomach.Not more auction bashing, please. They are a regulated way for a vendor to get a hassle free sale.
There’s already another thread running that is trying to make out that horses end up at auction need rescuing.
Have you ever tried regulating the community where the horse came from ? Anarchy covers it.As it was a distance sale, as per the law, the dealer should have accepted return for refund regardless of whether the horse was as described or not.
I know, but was in response to those saying dealer did nothing wrong or dealer could come for poster etc. Actually the dealer is not following the law themselves.Have you ever tried regulating the community where the horse came from ? Anarchy covers it.
I actually agree with most of this. At this point I’d be happy I got such a beautiful horse for a reasonable price.If I was the dealer I would be fuming especially if I had read this thread and I would be pursuing Jasmine. I cannot see anything in the advert that is a lie or even misleading. I think Ozzy had been ridden by a 10yo I read somewhere so mother and daughter share is OK.
advertised as an RDA candidate doesn't say he has been trained as one. He may be suitable given the correct training. . It only says he is a candidate, when trained he may fail at it.
did the dealer know Jasmine had health problems? if she had made that clear and any horse must fit in with that then OK but if not why would it come into it. It would be her responsibility to make sure the horse she was buying was suitable for health problems by looking at it, getting it professionally assessed.
This dealer may have a reputation I have no idea but from what has been said (and I suspect there is stuff that has not been said, we only recently learnt Jasmine rode Ozzie last week) I cannot see what legal case J has.
The price was reasonable, he was not advertised as anything he wasn't.
For someone buying him there was a lot they could have done to protect themselves before buying. Get him vetted at the dealers and watch how he behaved. Visit and lead him, tack him up, ride him in traffic or anywhere else. It seems to have been pretty easy for people on here in 1 night to have come up with his entire history, pics etc and details of his previous owner. They could have been contacted prior to purchase to discuss if he would be suitable.The dealer could have been googled both him personally and as a dealer. Now there is also a pic of him on the auction website.
There was no reason to take much of a risk buying Ozzie. Just do your homework.
The problem here appears to have been the Jasmine's total lack of experience both in horse handling and especially lack of recognition that some new horses take a long time to settle. In that settling in period the new horse is not going to behave like a saint. Also in having a go at the dealer on a public forum which in this particular instance appears to have been unnecessary. It would have been better to get qualified help to assess the situation and then go back to the dealer with a professional opinion if there was a problem which there doesn't even seem to be.
Devine is a horse dealer, that is how he makes his living. He saw a suitable horse, bought it and advertised it. Full stop. Many horse dealers do the same. He did't buy the horse as a pet to keep so obviously he put him up for sale. I'm not sure what difference the timing makes. If he collected Ozzie on the 24th then on that day or the 25th he must have got the girl riding and taken pics so after a day at the sales and rehoused Ozzie was perfectly manageable and per his video apparently easy to tack up.
To be very very blunt here (and I appreciate this will not get many likes) I don't understand why J is considering legal action, if I was her I would keep my head down and hope Devine goes away. Also, even more bluntly, spend the time instead of worrying about legal action, commenting on auction sites and previous owners actions sending to auction on getting to know Ozzie and handling him.
I see a lovely horse here and I really hope he gets a good home but something is starting to seem odd and it is not Ozzie.
It's no wonder he was unsettled when he got to your yard.I found Ozzy on the auction website. He was sold on the 24th May and then Devine put him up for sale on the 25th absolutely disgusting.
Well tbf the OP of that thread was actually saying that buying g from an auction isn' t rescuing.Not more auction bashing, please. They are a regulated way for a vendor to get a hassle free sale.
There’s already another thread running that is trying to make out that horses end up at auction need rescuing.
If this dealer does not want to comply with the law with regards to distance selling regulations then he should stop selling horses unseen. You are entitled to return the horse and have a refund for any reason or none regardless of whether the dealer makes up their own terms and conditions on fb. This applies even if you got the horse home and decided you wanted a dog instead. He spends enough time on dodgy dealer pages arguing with disgruntled customers and getting his mates to wade in on them to be aware of this. I don't agree with the law and think that if you don't have the where with all to go in person to view a horse to see at least at a basic level if you are compatible then you going to find horse ownership very very challenging especially with limited experience and funds. Buying unseen is fine for people who are much more flexible and prepared to work with whatever turns up.If I was the dealer I would be fuming especially if I had read this thread and I would be pursuing Jasmine. I cannot see anything in the advert that is a lie or even misleading. I think Ozzy had been ridden by a 10yo I read somewhere so mother and daughter share is OK.
She's also banned from keeping horses yet clearly still does and legal action would likely to potentially costly without achieving anything and be additional stress op does not need.
I thought Lucia Stanton / devine cobs were one and the same? Are they not?If this dealer does not want to comply with the law with regards to distance selling regulations then he should stop selling horses unseen. You are entitled to return the horse and have a refund for any reason or none regardless of whether the dealer makes up their own terms and conditions on fb. This applies even if you got the horse home and decided you wanted a dog instead. He spends enough time on dodgy dealer pages arguing with disgruntled customers and getting his mates to wade in on them to be aware of this. I don't agree with the law and think that if you don't have the where with all to go in person to view a horse to see at least at a basic level if you are compatible then you going to find horse ownership very very challenging especially with limited experience and funds. Buying unseen is fine for people who are much more flexible and prepared to work with whatever turns up.
Dealer is not banned. As well as dealing mostly in cobs or draught types he also shows cobs and breeds them. The girl riding looks like Lucia Stanton but in any case the court order may not preclude her from riding other peoples horses.
Agree 100 per cent.I feel very sad for the OP, but I am sure she realises how very foolish she was to purchase a horse like this, sight unseen, no vetting etc. etc. so no point labouring the point. My main concern (sorry OP but it is a fact for me anyway) is the future of this poor horse. For one I could not bear the thought of sending him back to the dealer to continue on the merry go round of cruelty and abuse as he passes from one dealer to the next.
Because it is very much cruelty and abuse to offer a horse like this for sale when it very clearly has huge issues, either mentally or physically and never an offer of a permanent caring home willing to either get to the bottom of the issue or PTS. OP you are going to lose your money anyway, and I know that is a huge blow being a pensioner myself.
However, in view of that could you not just try at least to get a full vetting done to establish what, if any, health problems the horse has and then make decisions about trying to treat or get expert help if it is behaviour related? If you send him back I can guarantee you will not get any money back and any other horse offered to you will be the same if not worse. And can you truly rest easy knowing the poor horse is still in that cruel chain when you could have at least tried to help in. Big ask I know, but sometimes life throws huge curve balls at us, it is how we deal with them that makes the difference to not just ourselves but anyone or any animal that is affected by our more difficult life decisions.
NoI thought Lucia Stanton / devine cobs were one and the same? Are they not?
No. I won't name the contact I was given, and I was subsequently warned off by others, but tbh I think they're just one of those dealers where you need to have your wits about you rather than borderline criminal as some have suggested.I thought Lucia Stanton / devine cobs were one and the same? Are they not?
I think most people would think more of a dealer that had done a decent assessment period before advertising. But it is what it is and arguably probably best he didn't spend too much time with this one. Seems like I might need to hunt out some badges.
NoI thought Lucia Stanton / devine cobs were one and the same? Are they not?
Yes but that's a different thing to going down the misrepresented route which in this case is more nuanced.As it was a distance sale, as per the law, the dealer should have accepted return for refund regardless of whether the horse was as described or not.
My comment was about the accuracy of the advert. There was nothing to stop OP returning the horse and taking legal action to get a refund. She asked and people warned this may not be cost effective. There was nothing to stop her ignoring that advice. That was nothing to do with whether Ozzie was a candidate for RDA.If this dealer does not want to comply with the law with regards to distance selling regulations then he should stop selling horses unseen. You are entitled to return the horse and have a refund for any reason or none regardless of whether the dealer makes up their own terms and conditions on fb. This applies even if you got the horse home and decided you wanted a dog instead.