MurphysMinder
Well-Known Member
Even if they are KC registered and from an assured breeder you need to do your homework. It is absolutely no guarantee.
I inspect for councils under the animal licensing regulations including dog breeding.
Not many people are aware that the coefficient of inbreeding % is only an optional higher standard and nowhere in the minimum standards (up to three star) is there any requirement for a COI % below a certain figure.
For example, I have recently inspected a three star breeder who is a kennel club assured breeder and her COI % for the last 10 litters or so is over 30%. The breed average is approx 11%. I find it shocking and I’m horrified I can approve a three star licence on that basis.
Even the kennel club seem to frown on it but will register her as an assured breeder!
How on earth would the general public be clued up on this when they expect an assured breeder to be the gold standard?
This is why a lot of responsible breeders have left, or refuse to join the Assured Breeders scheme. It was a great idea but hasn't quite worked out, in German Shepherds they require hip scoring, great, but they don't set a maximum score so you could theoretically have ABS breeding from a dog with a horrific score, and sadly there have been asssured breeders who have bred from dogs with scores far higher than the breed recommendation which the KC happily register.
Overall though, as others have said, non KC reg would always make me suspicious, registering a pup is probably one of the cheapest parts of breeding a litter, so I just don't see why you wouldn't if litter is eligible, and this whole not registering pet quality is just nonsense in my opinion.