Tulsi
Active Member
As many people have said, it depends on the RS - if a person has regular riding lessons at, say, Talland or the Yorkshire Riding Centre, I suspect they could learn to ride to quite a reasonable standard.
So basically, one can only 'truly' learn to ride if they fork out for private freelance instruction? That sucks!
So basically, one can only 'truly' learn to ride if they fork out for private freelance instruction? That sucks!
More riding school bashing coming I fear
There are plenty of people who have never been near a riding school who are rubbish - rubbish riders are not reserved to riding schools! Look on the bright side, at least they are trying to get tuition unlike the average know it all![]()
I don't see the issue with group lessons at all - whilst a private is great now and then to work on something specific, group lessons teach riders to work in groups (obviously) and allows them to learn visually from others, and closer reflects how you would work your own horse (e.g. quiet periods of rest in between work sessions during an hour ride).
I think those with poor views of group lessons in riding schools imagine nose to tail sessions following a lead file. After a rider has learnt the very basics (walk/trot), they should work in open order and learn how to ride a horse in its own space. I'd be horrified if I watched an intermediate/advanced lesson at my centre working as a ride around the school - just makes the horses nappy and creates riders who can't actually control a horse.
I'm not talking grand prix dressage horses or grade A showjumpers, but if a horse doesn't respond correctly to only the correct aids then it's not really teaching the rider very much. If the horse doesn't give the correct feel, the rider will never learn it.
I'm not sure where the preconception comes from that just because you own your own horse you can ride any better than someone at a RS?!!?.
I don't think you can learn to ride correctly, as I cannot imagine that schools have horses schooled to the standard that would be required, mainly due to the cost and partly due to the novices riding them each day.
I don't see the issue with group lessons at all - whilst a private is great now and then to work on something specific, group lessons teach riders to work in groups (obviously) and allows them to learn visually from others, and closer reflects how you would work your own horse (e.g. quiet periods of rest in between work sessions during an hour ride).
I think those with poor views of group lessons in riding schools imagine nose to tail sessions following a lead file. After a rider has learnt the very basics (walk/trot), they should work in open order and learn how to ride a horse in its own space. I'd be horrified if I watched an intermediate/advanced lesson at my centre working as a ride around the school - just makes the horses nappy and creates riders who can't actually control a horse.
HOWEVER I never learnt to think for myself and work out how to solve a problem. In an RS environment you always have an instructor there to tell you how to solve a problem, what to do when your horse bolts off, naps etc.[...] You have to work through it yourself and I doubt whether any riding school will ever be able to teach you how to do that.
[...]
I can only do all of the above things on a horse which already knows how to do them. I wouldn't have a clue how to teach a youngster to do lateral work, to jump etc.
[...]
But you won't ever be able to learn to think independently, to be able to solve any problem that your horse throws at you, because riding schools can't allow you the independence.
The riding school my boy is on livery at has regular unaffiliated dressage comps. School horses with riding school clients enter on an equal basis to privately owned horses (usually have a mixture of riding club types and "posh" young horses out for early experience). It's 50/50 as to who gets the placings. (W&T, Prelim, Nov, BE dressage tests up to novice).