ducktails
Well-Known Member
I have a feeling that this is going to sound so desperate that I could possibly sound crazy, but bear with me and please if you have anything to offer please do, because quite honestly I am at the end of my tether...
As brief as possible history, after 6 months of messing around with my own vets I sent my horse up to Animal Health Trust for a full lameness work up. Diagnosis was chronic suspensory damage to both hind legs, chronic damage to left fore suspensory and arthritic changes to sacro illiac joint. Sue Dyson told me my mare would never come back into any amount of athletic work and I applied for loss of use. At the grand old age of 7 I told my insurance company that I felt she would not be suitable as a pet and I didn't want to watch her deteriorate so elected for euthanasia....
Then.. I hear about Roger Meacock of natural healing solutions who I paid £300 (not normally that much but he came to me as I didn't want to put my girl through 6 hours of travelling). Roger came out and basically told me my horses teeth were awful despite being done and that her foot balance was poor and that this is what has caused the suspensory damage, he also came out put her pelvis back in and said thats what has caused the sacro illiac damage and that she will not only be able to be ridden, BUT be able to return to full athletic work that is within her capabilities including jumping, schooling etc. The future was to get her teeth done by bob livock (3 hours away) sort out the foot balance then bring her back into work.
cue me getting excited then only on coming down from the excitement has it left me feeling so confused that I can spend 6k at a vets to be told shoot her and 300 quid with this guy who said the problems are not permanent. Sooo I called back to Sue Dyson and put what Roger Meacock has said to me to her and she has basically called Roger a cowboy who is prying on gullible (I prefer desperate to give their horse every chance) owners. She has said that studies have been preformed on suspensory damage by vets and that even with damage detected to hind limbs within 6 weeks the return to work ratio is 14%.
I am so confused, this guy sounds so sure I know sugar cubes off this forum has also took his advice over Sue Dysons on her horse but I can't see how the vets you spend 6k on with all the machinery can be wrong over a guy and his theories.. I know who I want to believe and what he says make sense but I can't drag my self through this much longer. This mare is my baby, I need to make the right decision for her.
So please any advice, anyone out there had a horse recover from hind limb suspensory damage, insurance money is over surgery wasn't an option and I refuse to put her on box rest if the prognosis really is so poor. If doctor grass will do it she can have as much of the bloody green stuff as she wants but if this guy is talking **** and someone knows it out there please let me know.
If you have got to the bottom send me your address and I'll send you a medal
Terri
also in comp and vet
As brief as possible history, after 6 months of messing around with my own vets I sent my horse up to Animal Health Trust for a full lameness work up. Diagnosis was chronic suspensory damage to both hind legs, chronic damage to left fore suspensory and arthritic changes to sacro illiac joint. Sue Dyson told me my mare would never come back into any amount of athletic work and I applied for loss of use. At the grand old age of 7 I told my insurance company that I felt she would not be suitable as a pet and I didn't want to watch her deteriorate so elected for euthanasia....
Then.. I hear about Roger Meacock of natural healing solutions who I paid £300 (not normally that much but he came to me as I didn't want to put my girl through 6 hours of travelling). Roger came out and basically told me my horses teeth were awful despite being done and that her foot balance was poor and that this is what has caused the suspensory damage, he also came out put her pelvis back in and said thats what has caused the sacro illiac damage and that she will not only be able to be ridden, BUT be able to return to full athletic work that is within her capabilities including jumping, schooling etc. The future was to get her teeth done by bob livock (3 hours away) sort out the foot balance then bring her back into work.
cue me getting excited then only on coming down from the excitement has it left me feeling so confused that I can spend 6k at a vets to be told shoot her and 300 quid with this guy who said the problems are not permanent. Sooo I called back to Sue Dyson and put what Roger Meacock has said to me to her and she has basically called Roger a cowboy who is prying on gullible (I prefer desperate to give their horse every chance) owners. She has said that studies have been preformed on suspensory damage by vets and that even with damage detected to hind limbs within 6 weeks the return to work ratio is 14%.
I am so confused, this guy sounds so sure I know sugar cubes off this forum has also took his advice over Sue Dysons on her horse but I can't see how the vets you spend 6k on with all the machinery can be wrong over a guy and his theories.. I know who I want to believe and what he says make sense but I can't drag my self through this much longer. This mare is my baby, I need to make the right decision for her.
So please any advice, anyone out there had a horse recover from hind limb suspensory damage, insurance money is over surgery wasn't an option and I refuse to put her on box rest if the prognosis really is so poor. If doctor grass will do it she can have as much of the bloody green stuff as she wants but if this guy is talking **** and someone knows it out there please let me know.
If you have got to the bottom send me your address and I'll send you a medal
Terri
also in comp and vet