TarrSteps
Well-Known Member
Oh, and nobody has mentioned my very favourite muscles, the psoas muscles, so I might have a strop now. Humph.
I did infer them though, with my seat bone lifting comment, does that count?
Oh, and nobody has mentioned my very favourite muscles, the psoas muscles, so I might have a strop now. Humph.
But this is not the issue. The issue is the definition of an international competitor. It's not geographical as much as an indication that someone is good enough to represent their country. That's what people are trying to explain.
Say what?? You base this information on...? There may only be 2 countries in N America, but there are lots and lots in S Am and you really should not be tarring them all with the same brush. Not with school children being murdered in schools in the USA...
In answer to the original question, no, riding and training horses neither should be or is complicated, it just isn't easy! We need to understand the theory which, in itself, is not so hard. When it comes to applying that theory the feeling for what is needed is required and the decisions have to become instinctive otherwise the moment has gone. There is time to think what exercises might help or to tell yourself to sit up or similar but there is not time to say to yourself anything too long winded or complex. Horses actually respond best to a simple set of rules. It is our responsibility to be consistent with our requests and keep things as understandable as possible. That means the combination of leg, seat and rein needs to be suitable for each horse's physical and mental needs but their job stays the same (inside leg, outside leg, inside rein, outside rein and seat).
If I got complicated with any of my clients (human or equine) they would just stand and look at me like I had come from Mars or tell me where to go in fairly plain terms! This is lucky as I'm a simple soul!
Well...not since I was a Junior then....as an adult I have not represented my country as an official FEI representative.....as a YR...yes...but it was here I started to realize my limits and rehashed my future plans
Now...has any of my horses shown internationally under this defintion....yes....did I have anything to do with their training and rise until the rider was selected...you bet....I have started/broke/trained these kinds of horses yes.
But under the definition which Auslander finally decided to give to explain the differences in the terms...no..I have not ridden interantionally as an official long listed rider/country representative in over 33 years
I thought that comment might not sit well with you . . .
See, this is where it's so much easier for you - you're on the right side of the country. We have so much further to travel.
Unless I went across the border to Norfolk - I'm sure that would count as they all talk funny.....
Perhaps Lolo could clarify?![]()
We don't talk funny, we just freestyle.
Can Norfolk count as a separate country? Because then Al ad I would both be international riders... I mean, it takes us well over an hour to leave the bloomin place. It would almost be quicker to get to France than to Wales![]()
Say what?? You base this information on...? There may only be 2 countries in N America, but there are lots and lots in S Am and you really should not be tarring them all with the same brush. Not with school children being murdered in schools in the USA...
I thought that comment might not sit well with you . . .
Look, there it is, her sarcasm on the dock, waving as the ferry rolls off across the waves to Rantland....![]()
In all fairness, nieghham did say at the bottom of that spiel that she was being sarcastic and hoped it didn't miss the boat.
Look, there it is, her sarcasm on the dock, waving as the ferry rolls off across the waves to Rantland....![]()
Oh no! now sarcasm is getting complicated
Is the ocean in Rantland made of Gin?
It seemed appropriate, no?
And yes, of course the sea is made of gin.![]()
We don't talk funny, we just freestyle.
Can Norfolk count as a separate country? Because then Al ad I would both be international riders... I mean, it takes us well over an hour to leave the bloomin place. It would almost be quicker to get to France than to Wales![]()
Say what?? You base this information on...? There may only be 2 countries in N America, but there are lots and lots in S Am and you really should not be tarring them all with the same brush. Not with school children being murdered in schools in the USA...
In all fairness, nieghham did say at the bottom of that spiel that she was being sarcastic and hoped it didn't miss the boat.
Look, there it is, her sarcasm on the dock, waving as the ferry rolls off across the waves to Rantland....![]()
Back to the OP, I do think the best trainers are the ones that give you a clear and simple way to do something, then develop your feel by being alongside you at just the right time saying "yes, that's it!" when you put it all together and have the light bulb moment. A few of those moments and surely that's when you start to develop the automatic/instinctive side of riding?
Uh oh. . . .
PF does LIVE there.
I'm sure there are awful things in South America but I think that post does sum up why some people have their knickers in a twist, neighman. I'm sure there is validity in what you wrote but to say to someone who LIVES there that this is all there is to it is, well, offensive.
I actually know who you are and I do understand that you are not trying to offend or to assume that anyone on here is somehow too dense to understand what you're talking about but it is coming across that way, a bit. And I've had about 30 years of instruction in Canada - probably from some of the same people as you! - and have never had things explained in such an impenetrable way. I've had people asking me this week if this is how Canadians teach!? I am confused by this idea that location/culture is behind the confusion . . .mostly here they mock me for my slang and my spelling! I have simply never had or heard these conversations talking to riders, trainers and judges at home. Not even at Balkenhol's seminar or in discussion with Team riders. I'll admit I have only seen Walter teach once and while I admire his take on things, I find some of his hard core followers a bit hard to take. No reflection on the man himself!
I realise this is your way and it works for you. I also realise that this is a discussion and not a lesson (lost of a few people originally, I think). I even actually agree with the details of much of what you have written - those fine adjustments to position and balance are the details of good riding. But what is the end to making things so complicated that good, educated riders - let alone riders who may not yet have that level of experience - can't follow. There are people on this thread that have ridden and judged well into the FEI levels, who take training with - and even train top people. You have said that is your positions too, so fair enough they asked for proof. I know you haven't SAID they are numpties (roughly, idiots) who do not ride at a high enough level to "get it" at the level you are discussing things, but that is how it has come across. I'm sure they would be happy to discuss theory with you - they put up with me, or at least they are polite enough to pretend to - it's all just gone a bit wrong. And, to be honest, at this point "they" have Olympic dressage medals and we do not! I'm not saying everyone here rides better than everyone in Canada but I would say yes, more people here have been exposed to very good dressage riding and training. And that is really saying something as anyone I know who regularly goes to the Continent to train would roll their eyes at that statement!
And, for what it's worth, I don't think the natives have all covered themselves in glory either. I know it's all a joke but some of it has verged on bullying. After all, what does any of it mean to any of us? We go away and ride our horses and do what works for us and leave others to what works for them.
I blame the weather. If we were all out riding we wouldn't have time to split hairs!
Well, except for PF who is baking in the South American sun.![]()
Blimeythat was a heavy 15 mins, need gin..............
Back to the OP, I do think the best trainers are the ones that give you a clear and simple way to do something, then develop your feel by being alongside you at just the right time saying "yes, that's it!" when you put it all together and have the light bulb moment. A few of those moments and surely that's when you start to develop the automatic/instinctive side of riding?
This! This this this! Exactly.
Nieghham, I hope you'll stick around, and I hope that maybe you'll be able to slightly simplify the way you post on here to enable us all to understand you.
Fwiw I can talk dressage theory for hours, happily, but I have never read anything as impenetrable and obfuscatory as your posts! Maybe your passion to get the message across means that you type in a 'stream of consciousness' way, or something? I don't consider myself stupid, I read fast and have a Degree in English Literature fgs, but I honestly couldn't get through some of your paragraphs! So, please, if you could just make them a bit easier, that would help.
You took the ganging-up on here very well, for which I applaud you. I hope you realise that the Brits' default setting is to mock, including their friends... don't take it personally!