blood_magik
Well-Known Member
I won't be rehoming another dog.
Last edited:
I won't be rehoming another dog.
Hope this does not put you off rescuing again...... very sad he is having to go back, especially at this time of year.
All rescues as puppies come as blank canvases they just get ****** up along the way and passed on to rescue.
Im pretty sure your home situation with workman coming and going would unsettle any dog, very surprised the Dogstrust let any dog go into that situation.
....... possibly some of you would be more confident at dealing with an sneaky attack type aggressive dog.
........
People on this forum - not necessarily this bit - can be both very supportive and very judgemental.
A lady had a horse PTS as it blindly bolted twice, I think she did the right thing and pages of posts agree with that.
The OP here had a dog that unpredictably attacked 2 people and she has returned him to the rescue. I think she did the right thing for her, possibly some of you would be more confident at dealing with an sneaky attack type aggressive dog.
All I am saying is give her some space - she must be gutted.
The truth of the matter, reading some of the responses on here, is that very few of those contributing have any experience at all in dealing with aggressive or dangerous dogs, and the OP has done exactly the right thing. I'd go further, that "the trainer" has suggested clicker training, would be laughable were it not so potentially serious.
Alec.
Apologies for hijacking this thread but I find this comment fairly insensitive and ignorant. Operant conditioning and related techniques like NILIF, BAT, behaviour extinction and counter-conditioning are very successful training methods for aggressive dogs, their efficacy well documented in both scientific studies and practical cases - nothing laughable about what the trainer suggested. They do, however, take time and they are not a guarrantee of success (e.g. for animals with chemical and neurological problems medication may play a great role in helping them become more trainable and, despite all we know, there are still animals whose behaviour doesn't respond to our best efforts and we are not sure why, e.g. tumours, seizures, etc.).
I should qualify that I know very little about aggressive dogs. My training was restricted to basic obedience for family pets, but my experience has, sadly, brought be across an aggressive dog and I have had to learn about different options. I would not presume to advice anyone on their aggressive dog, much less on the internet, this would be a job for a qualified professional, but I would also not sneer at very standard advice such as teaching the dog to retreat to a safe place.
I fully agree with this. However, the dog in the OP seemed to have a particular problem with tradesmen. I can understand that, as their body language is quite different to a 'normal' visitor and they march around the house creating noise and disruption.I just think dog ownership is meant to be fun and some of these rescue dogs need a very experienced and on the ball handler, not everyone wants to deal with what could be percieved as a 'time bomb'.
Apologies for hijacking this thread but I find this comment fairly insensitive and ignorant. Operant conditioning and related techniques like NILIF, BAT, behaviour extinction and counter-conditioning are very successful training methods for aggressive dogs, their efficacy well documented in both scientific studies and practical cases - nothing laughable about what the trainer suggested.
I should qualify that I know very little about aggressive dogs. .......
Dont get annoyed it is a standard Alec response, if you cant beat it into submission its not worth bothering with........
Booboos, as you seem to have the answer, whilst admitting to having no experience, perhaps you could accept that your opinion will be of greater value when you can speak from experience rather than quoting from scientific studies. I've never written a scientific paper, but I can assure you that I've dealt with and trained dogs, extensively, and many of which would have been considered dangerous, to the point that they were beyond the average pet owner. There would be little point in regaling you with tales of success, as you've obviously done a bit of reading and have a ready formed view.
Alec.
As a footnote, may I respectfully suggest that you consider the definition of the word "Ignorant"? a.
Better to keep quiet and be thought a fool than to open one's mouth and prove the point.
.......
And do go on regale us with something: what are your qualifications? how many aggressive dogs have you dealt with? what is your success rate? how many clients have you had come to you with aggressive dogs? how many vet referrals have you had with aggressive dogs?
You've accepted that you've no experience of the subject, but continue to argue. I fail to see the point of trying to explain anything to those who've firstly no interest in listening, and secondly have entrenched, misinformed and preconceived ideas.
I would imagine that in your professional capacity and when you discuss with others those subjects about which you actually can speak with authority drawn from experience, then when you meet with those who expound nonsense, or the argument that they must be right, because they read a report, somewhere, then you as I, prefer to leave others in their blissful state! I'd have thought that you'd have had a degree of sympathy for my currently bemused condition!
Alec.
Firstly, you have not explained anything at all. Neither your qualifications, why anyone else is wrong or much else.
.......
......., you can rely on my professional authority to tell you that your arguments are poorly informed and unconvincing.