horsegirl
Well-Known Member
But you're not, are you? I and another user have already provided you with examples of the communicator finding out something really specific about that animal which has a probability of being guessed that is really, really low, and you still think they were either lucky guesses or found out about in the pub![]()
Don't get me wrong, a healthy level of cynicism is a great protector up to a point. However, I think that if doubt vs believing was a scale with full on non-belief as 10, pure blind belief a 1, and an open mind at 5, you'd be a 9, which is making it very difficult to want to work with you - If I were to do a communiction with your horse, it is entirely possible that I make a successful connection but you still wouldn't believe me.![]()
I know you're likely to turn that around and say it proves your point, but it seems i'm dammed if I do, dammed if I don't.
I didn't charge for a long time, doing it to help others, for experience, for pleasure. Now I ask for my fee only if the first few pieces of information I convey to an owner is considered to be accurate for that horse and the owner is happy that a communication has taken place (and usually the rest that follows also confirms this). This is a reasonably common practice, designed to help protect ACers from reputation damage, and customers from being ripped off, so HG perhaps the best way is for you to contact someone who does this but doesn't know who you are on facebook or HHO - that way you are also reducing the likelihood of them researching you that way. In fact, you could go a step further and approach someone with a picture you have never published, and not tell them your and your horse's real names from newly set up email account.![]()
Yes I am willing to believe it but not based on other people saying the info they were given was correct. As I have stated people will make the info fit when they want to believe. It is simple if you can contact my horse and tell me something then I am more than happy to pay for a reading. BTW you said pub, I didn't are you seriously expecting me to believe that she didn't mention her problems and splitting with her husband to anyone else but her horse?
It reminds me of a conversation I had with a friend re: a human medium. The friend's husband and the medium's husbands worked together and my friend went with another friend for a reading. My friend told me the next day how strange it was that the medium "got" loads of info about her but very little about her friend. hmmmm strange...