jkitten
Well-Known Member
Reading on here, I'm beginning to get the impression that forward going doesn't mean what I thought it meant, so I was hoping people could share their own understandings of it?
As a concrete example, the horse I rode in my last couple of years of riding school was described at the time as forward. He was a wonderful horse with a great character, extremely willing and with the power to back it up. He would tackle any jump you put in front of him, and needed only enough aids to communicate what you wanted. However, he was NEVER spooky or sharp. Even at full gallop, which he loved, his brakes were always fully functional. The only time he ever put a foot wrong while I knew him was when there was a huge crash just outside the arena and he took off in the other direction for about the length of the school before I was able to pull him up, at which point he was a bit sheepish and we carried on as normal. Since it was a perfectly understandable reaction, it never dented my trust in him (I'd had a lot worse on less 'advanced' ponies!).
The reason I'm using him as an example is that he was consistently talked about as being forward going, basically because he was enthusiastic and willing, however IMO he would have been a brilliant first horse. With the consensus here being that anyone getting themselves a horse described as 'forward going' for their first horse is setting themselves up to be overhorsed, I feel like there must be more to the term than that? Does it mean more like fizzy and needing to be held back a lot?
Many thanks in advance!
(Edit: I can't spell...)
As a concrete example, the horse I rode in my last couple of years of riding school was described at the time as forward. He was a wonderful horse with a great character, extremely willing and with the power to back it up. He would tackle any jump you put in front of him, and needed only enough aids to communicate what you wanted. However, he was NEVER spooky or sharp. Even at full gallop, which he loved, his brakes were always fully functional. The only time he ever put a foot wrong while I knew him was when there was a huge crash just outside the arena and he took off in the other direction for about the length of the school before I was able to pull him up, at which point he was a bit sheepish and we carried on as normal. Since it was a perfectly understandable reaction, it never dented my trust in him (I'd had a lot worse on less 'advanced' ponies!).
The reason I'm using him as an example is that he was consistently talked about as being forward going, basically because he was enthusiastic and willing, however IMO he would have been a brilliant first horse. With the consensus here being that anyone getting themselves a horse described as 'forward going' for their first horse is setting themselves up to be overhorsed, I feel like there must be more to the term than that? Does it mean more like fizzy and needing to be held back a lot?
Many thanks in advance!
(Edit: I can't spell...)
Last edited: