pookie
Well-Known Member
QR
I must admit, I'm kind of surprised by the comments in this thread. I know the article is anti-hunting, but even so.....a pack of dogs of any form suddenly appearing in your garden would be traumatising for some people. I own rottweilers - if I allowed them to trespass on someone else's land, particularly into someone else's garden, I'd expect all sorts of negative reactions and possibly police involvement. The language in the article might be sensationalist, but some people genuinely are scared of dogs....some people are terrified of a single dog, let alone a pack. And even if they aren't, should they have to be ok with anything or anyone being on their property if they don't want them there?
I do think there's a difference between being on someone's 'land' and being in someone's garden - I'm not entirely sure how I'd feel if I was sitting out in summer and a pack of dogs appeared over my garden fence. I'd probably make a massive fuss of them
but I'd still be p*ssed off at the trespass, the disruption and the implication I should put up and shut up. I wouldn't compare it to a car crash, but the elderly widow who lives two houses along from me might.
I guess I'm in the distinct minority here, but I don't think it makes a blind bit of difference to the general principle if they happen to be a hunt pack or not - people shouldn't have to put up with their gardens being invaded by anyone or anything they don't want there. I'm saying this as a huge dog lover, and someone who lived and grew up in rural Glos for many years. The ladies in the article might be aggressively anti-hunt, but that really shouldn't detract from the alleged story that some hunt packs have trespassed and (possibly) killed pets.
Hunting gets an awful lot of bad press anyway. So do rottweilers, and I've always taken great pains to make sure my dogs don't even accidentally reinforce that reputation, changing a fair few negative opinions over the years. In this case, surely taking the allegations from the article seriously could only help hunting to be seen as responsible and courteous rather than arrogant and a possible liability?
Sorry if any of my comments go against the grain
I must admit, I'm kind of surprised by the comments in this thread. I know the article is anti-hunting, but even so.....a pack of dogs of any form suddenly appearing in your garden would be traumatising for some people. I own rottweilers - if I allowed them to trespass on someone else's land, particularly into someone else's garden, I'd expect all sorts of negative reactions and possibly police involvement. The language in the article might be sensationalist, but some people genuinely are scared of dogs....some people are terrified of a single dog, let alone a pack. And even if they aren't, should they have to be ok with anything or anyone being on their property if they don't want them there?
I do think there's a difference between being on someone's 'land' and being in someone's garden - I'm not entirely sure how I'd feel if I was sitting out in summer and a pack of dogs appeared over my garden fence. I'd probably make a massive fuss of them
I guess I'm in the distinct minority here, but I don't think it makes a blind bit of difference to the general principle if they happen to be a hunt pack or not - people shouldn't have to put up with their gardens being invaded by anyone or anything they don't want there. I'm saying this as a huge dog lover, and someone who lived and grew up in rural Glos for many years. The ladies in the article might be aggressively anti-hunt, but that really shouldn't detract from the alleged story that some hunt packs have trespassed and (possibly) killed pets.
Hunting gets an awful lot of bad press anyway. So do rottweilers, and I've always taken great pains to make sure my dogs don't even accidentally reinforce that reputation, changing a fair few negative opinions over the years. In this case, surely taking the allegations from the article seriously could only help hunting to be seen as responsible and courteous rather than arrogant and a possible liability?
Sorry if any of my comments go against the grain