Bananaman
Well-Known Member
What do we think of the article in today's H&H..........'Are we becoming colour blind?'?
It is about the current rise in popularity of the coloured horse.
I admit to not having read it word for word yet but am I alone in being angered by Natalie Kirkpatrick's comment............
'' Just because a horse is successful in competition, it doesn't mean that it should be a stallion''
OK, I can go with that, for me temperament is one of the most important qualities along with good conformation, so yes, I'll agree there. However, she continues........
''We don't need that many stallions - just one of each type would be ideal''
WHAT?
Mrs Kilpatrick does go on to clarify her remark by saying that Holland breeds much better sports horses than we do and they have only ever had one coloured stallion.
Well I guess that may be true but it doesn't mean that we are not capable of breeding horses that are worthy of being stallions AND happen to be two tone.
My view is that if we are not breeding for colour, and I do think that all the afore mentioned qualities are much more important than just colour, does Mrs K feel the same about chestnut stallions and bays ...............? Should we only have one type of each in each colour?
Whatever happened to freedom of choice?
I totally agree that we must keep up the standards and surely that is partly the job of the grading judges but also partly of the mare owners not to breed from inferior mares.
Well, I've let off a bit of steam now!
What do you all think?
It is about the current rise in popularity of the coloured horse.
I admit to not having read it word for word yet but am I alone in being angered by Natalie Kirkpatrick's comment............
'' Just because a horse is successful in competition, it doesn't mean that it should be a stallion''
OK, I can go with that, for me temperament is one of the most important qualities along with good conformation, so yes, I'll agree there. However, she continues........
''We don't need that many stallions - just one of each type would be ideal''
WHAT?
Mrs Kilpatrick does go on to clarify her remark by saying that Holland breeds much better sports horses than we do and they have only ever had one coloured stallion.
Well I guess that may be true but it doesn't mean that we are not capable of breeding horses that are worthy of being stallions AND happen to be two tone.
My view is that if we are not breeding for colour, and I do think that all the afore mentioned qualities are much more important than just colour, does Mrs K feel the same about chestnut stallions and bays ...............? Should we only have one type of each in each colour?
Whatever happened to freedom of choice?
I totally agree that we must keep up the standards and surely that is partly the job of the grading judges but also partly of the mare owners not to breed from inferior mares.
Well, I've let off a bit of steam now!