Louby
Well-Known Member
This clause has been in quite a few years now as I remember not having any exclusion after my horse used £5k vets fees for GA for tooth removal and complications that followed. That was 7 yrs ago and my vet was astounded that I didnt think I had an exclusion in the following years policy. What I didnt realise was the wording had changed so exclusions were no longer listed but a paragraph was in the policy about pre existing and previous conditions but I hadnt noticed.
Saying that, NFU have been fantastic and I wouldnt change to anyone else. They arent the only ones to do this and when I questioned it following another massive claim for a fractured leg!! they said it would only come into force if something happened to the same leg as a result of the fracture, so things like Navic, ringbone, accidents etc wouldnt be excluded in the future.
Saying that, NFU have been fantastic and I wouldnt change to anyone else. They arent the only ones to do this and when I questioned it following another massive claim for a fractured leg!! they said it would only come into force if something happened to the same leg as a result of the fracture, so things like Navic, ringbone, accidents etc wouldnt be excluded in the future.