Cortez
Tough but Fair
Whatever: if your horse is cold, put a rug on it.
Yes! Hence the importance of anonymous peer review in academic papers to prevent people being distracted by 'names'. I was very surprised at how DM reacted though. Scientists disagree with each other all the time. That's why they publish a full account of how they arrived at theor conclusions so others can scrutinise what they say and either support it, question it or refute it. Ok I can see how very knowledgeable people being critiqued by Prof Google is irksome but many of the comments on this thread were perfectly reasonable questions. Not sure why an ego-massaging visit to FB was necessary.
Peer reviews don't usually involve calling other people's work/opinions "rubbish"/"wrong" though. I can understand perfectly how annoying that might be.
Is the right answer ðŸ˜Whatever: if your horse is cold, put a rug on it.
Of course it is .Is the right answer ðŸ˜
Indeed, ycbm could and should have been more diplomatic in her comments. She has since acknowledged this. However, Dr David Marlin has continued with his utterly unprofessional personal rants on FB, and many of the comments are still there tonight.Peer reviews don't usually involve calling other people's work/opinions "rubbish"/"wrong" though. I can understand perfectly how annoying that might be.
Indeed, ycbm could and should have been more diplomatic in her comments. She has since acknowledged this. However, Dr David Marlin has continued with his utterly unprofessional personal rants on FB, and many of the comments are still there tonight.
I've just had a look at the thread on fb.... Pathetic!
Of course it is .
I sometimes think ‘science ‘ stops people learning to use common sense .
If your horse is cold rug it ,if your horses loses weight easily keep it a bit warmer than a fat one it really is very simple .
As a scientist I genuinely still don't understand the reluctance to discuss things further when things come into question, I was very disappointed at the number of actually quite interesting and informed comments when he posted about dogs during the summer that were deleted rather than addressing the points, even if you still disagree with them. It is totally alien to me to not discuss and address people's criticisms when dealing with science, IME it always happens between different research groups and when you are researching a fairly niche area you do tend to end up reviewing each others papers. I'm aware it was a BIG lesson for me to learn but certainly made me a better scientist than I was.
Any respect I had for the man has just been lost ... I’ve read the fb page and it’s the most bullying, disrespectful load of tosh I’ve ever read. And he calls himself professional... and an educator.
As a scientist I genuinely still don't understand the reluctance to discuss things further when things come into question, I was very disappointed at the number of actually quite interesting and informed comments when he posted about dogs during the summer that were deleted rather than addressing the points, even if you still disagree with them. It is totally alien to me to not discuss and address people's criticisms when dealing with science, IME it always happens between different research groups and when you are researching a fairly niche area you do tend to end up reviewing each others papers. I'm aware it was a BIG lesson for me to learn but certainly made me a better scientist than I was.
Asha, a stirling contribution!
would you not prefer a chocolate hobnob?
I’ll settle for the milk ones ( see how I’m willing to compromise 😉)sorry milk currently as tescos version. Def my favourite biscuit option!
I think you've put your finger on itSomehow I get the feeling that HHO doesn't stroke his ego enough.