Is Conformation Always the Most Important Thing?

Swaybacked horses are famously EXTREMELY comfortable to ride, and having ridden a couple I can a confirm that. American Saddlebreds, which are ridden with very high head carriage (and hollow backs) are very prone to sway backs, I have ridden a few elderly ex show horses that seemed as happy as could be. Still wouldn't buy one.

There are also some lines of Morgan horses that have sway backs. I knew of one that had a long and useful working life, although when you first saw her you would think "how?"
 
Actually I think temperament is everything :p

But why buy a horse with bad conformation? Or more importantly, why breed it? There will be exceptions - horses that made it despite limitations, there always are, but they are unusual and that is why people discuss them. Personally, I feel that if you are paying a lot of money, for a horse that will be pushed athletically and hopefully stay sound into old age, don't get something that has innate weaknesses.

Sway backs & ewe necks improve with correct work. Turned in feet and straight hocks won't.
 
i actually quite like the baloubet de rouet horse as a type of horse, its the overall package that counts and how the horse delivers, a sway back would not put me off a horse.
 
Sway backs & ewe necks improve with correct work. Turned in feet and straight hocks won't.

Lol I've got the exception to this - *some* turned in feet will improve, I really wish I had photos and video of K when I first got her - she was so pigeon toed and had a horrible dishing movement. Her feet look straight now and her movement is nearly 100% correct, I wouldn't remark on it if I saw her for the first time now. She was so, so weak and out of condition, I guess getting her muscles working properly has tightened everything up at the top of her legs... she appears taller too but can't have grown skeletally, being 12 this time.

Hocks though... yup reckon you'd be stuck with them :lol:
 
Conformation is not the absolute be-all and end-all, but it is important in terms of estimating probable soundness and way of movement. Some horses do manage to perform in spite of less-than-ideal conformation, and that is what competition records should tell you when considering a new purchase, but it's a bit of a gamble taking on something that's not at least reasonably well put together, and I wouldn't personally.

There are compromises that I am willing to make as regards conformation, but I wouldn't take that showjumper if it was free, even given the record, because it wouldn't suit my requirements. Can't be dealing with upright shoulders and backs like that when I am in desperate need of something with a long, low, pendulum-like stride. Don't think much of its leg either, to be honest, but I am dreadfully picky in that department.
 
I don't think it's everything but it is important to have decent ish put together horse that suits the purpose you've got it for.
Having said that my first pony was a sway backed welsh cross with horrendously shaped back legs. She lived a long and healthy life with no issues at all. Retired at 31 and died when she was 38. The only issue the vet found was a little arthritis in her front and back legs. The sway back never proved to be an issue and she died of a heart attack in the field. She was a confidence giving hacker with a heart of gold, and as my first pony she was brilliant .
 
Top