Alec Swan
...
It's the Pointer-Foxhound thread, and the posts of one particular person, which has set me to thinking.
Now then, stick with me to the end, and tell me whether you agree, or not;
All so often we consider certain breeds of dogs as household pets. The question is, "Are they, or can they be"? If those dogs which are primarily for serving man in a work capacity, are they worth the effort when they're denied that drug?
Let's consider some of the breeds;
English Pointers. A work dog. A dog bred for and at home on the moor. The work variety are never taught to walk to heal, on or off the lead.
The Collie or Sheepdog. A work dog. A dog which whilst designed and bred to work for man, needs an alternative stimulation if it's to be denied livestock.
The GSD and their "kind". A work dog, or at least it was. Given the right home environment and the right and balanced relationship, can be as good a company as any could want. Shut in, unsocialised and ignored, they become "can" become a liability.
The Gundog breeds. Work dogs, but probably more accepting of domesticity, than some (all accept Cockers
).
The Bull breeds. No longer kept for work, thankfully, but in the wrong hands, dangerous liabilities. In the right hands, a delight.
Terriers (Proper ones!), I wont go there. They're nuts, all of them!
The Huskies, and their derivatives. There's a lad in our village who had/has one, I haven't seen it for a while and think that it's reached a sticky end. When he first got it, I asked him "Have you any idea what you've taken on"? He looked vacant and said that his mate had one. It was a quite striking animal to look at.
Some of the Sight Hounds, and the list goes on. Feel free to add your own!
My point and my question is, when we take on those dogs which have a purpose within their breeding, and we don't allow them that "Purpose", are we always prepared to find another stimuli for them? In the case of Pointers, I'm not sure what that could be, but perhaps others will know.
I wouldn't keep a sheepdog, if I didn't keep sheep.
So, what do you think? If we don't keep dogs which arrived by a specific "use-route", what do we keep? Are we prepared to consider that the dog which by its breeding should be amenable to training, will still be amenable, spending its life lying on its bed, and if you consider that every dog and every person in life needs purpose, how do you deal with it? I'd be interested in your thoughts.
Alec.
Now then, stick with me to the end, and tell me whether you agree, or not;
All so often we consider certain breeds of dogs as household pets. The question is, "Are they, or can they be"? If those dogs which are primarily for serving man in a work capacity, are they worth the effort when they're denied that drug?
Let's consider some of the breeds;
English Pointers. A work dog. A dog bred for and at home on the moor. The work variety are never taught to walk to heal, on or off the lead.
The Collie or Sheepdog. A work dog. A dog which whilst designed and bred to work for man, needs an alternative stimulation if it's to be denied livestock.
The GSD and their "kind". A work dog, or at least it was. Given the right home environment and the right and balanced relationship, can be as good a company as any could want. Shut in, unsocialised and ignored, they become "can" become a liability.
The Gundog breeds. Work dogs, but probably more accepting of domesticity, than some (all accept Cockers
The Bull breeds. No longer kept for work, thankfully, but in the wrong hands, dangerous liabilities. In the right hands, a delight.
Terriers (Proper ones!), I wont go there. They're nuts, all of them!
The Huskies, and their derivatives. There's a lad in our village who had/has one, I haven't seen it for a while and think that it's reached a sticky end. When he first got it, I asked him "Have you any idea what you've taken on"? He looked vacant and said that his mate had one. It was a quite striking animal to look at.
Some of the Sight Hounds, and the list goes on. Feel free to add your own!
My point and my question is, when we take on those dogs which have a purpose within their breeding, and we don't allow them that "Purpose", are we always prepared to find another stimuli for them? In the case of Pointers, I'm not sure what that could be, but perhaps others will know.
I wouldn't keep a sheepdog, if I didn't keep sheep.
So, what do you think? If we don't keep dogs which arrived by a specific "use-route", what do we keep? Are we prepared to consider that the dog which by its breeding should be amenable to training, will still be amenable, spending its life lying on its bed, and if you consider that every dog and every person in life needs purpose, how do you deal with it? I'd be interested in your thoughts.
Alec.