samlf
Well-Known Member
I'm a little confused. I was under the impression that sheep and cattle do just as much damage on wet ground as (unshod) horses do.
The reason I ask is that a farmer has advised my land owner that my two horses have 'ruined' a field and he is 'very concerned' that it wont recover. But has also advised that highland cattle or sheep would be much more suitable.
I am thinking that having maybe 20 sheep would be just as detrimental to the land as two unshod horses? And as for cattle I thought they were even worse as cloven hooved plus just as heavy as a horse!
Can someone set me straight on this?
This farmer has also said that it's pointless getting the land harrowed to help it recover, which again in my experience I have found it really helpful.
The land isn't really ruined, just very very wet and muddy round the gate. I think he is massively over-reacting as I have seen much worse fields recover easily.
I don't know if there's an ulterior motive but it would be useful to have opinions from those who have experience with livestock vs horses on a field.
The reason I ask is that a farmer has advised my land owner that my two horses have 'ruined' a field and he is 'very concerned' that it wont recover. But has also advised that highland cattle or sheep would be much more suitable.
I am thinking that having maybe 20 sheep would be just as detrimental to the land as two unshod horses? And as for cattle I thought they were even worse as cloven hooved plus just as heavy as a horse!
Can someone set me straight on this?
This farmer has also said that it's pointless getting the land harrowed to help it recover, which again in my experience I have found it really helpful.
The land isn't really ruined, just very very wet and muddy round the gate. I think he is massively over-reacting as I have seen much worse fields recover easily.
I don't know if there's an ulterior motive but it would be useful to have opinions from those who have experience with livestock vs horses on a field.