loan to buy/trial

I don't think either are a commitment, you loan with a view or trial with a view to purchase. If the horse rears up and breaks your neck, I hardly feel you could be held to any commitment to purchase. Hence why they are such a rare but valuable thing :)
 
Mmmmmmmm, so a trial i would expect to pay expense's and a loan i would expect them to pay expenses. With of course with signed agreements. Correct?
 
IMO loan with view to buy is more long term than a trial. I had my horse on loan with view to buy for a year before I purchased him. Purchase price was agreed before I took him on and the loan year was treated as a normal 'loan'.

A trial is usually just for a week or so and is sometimes only offered if the horse stays at the current yard.

Unless the horse stayed at the current yard for a trial I would expect the potential purchaser to cover all expenses, although owner should agree to keep insurance for a horse that was on a short term trial.
 
I don't think either are a commitment, you loan with a view or trial with a view to purchase. If the horse rears up and breaks your neck, I hardly feel you could be held to any commitment to purchase. Hence why they are such a rare but valuable thing :)

When my friends LWVTB bolted and ditched me and fractured my spine leaving me in intensive care it went back quick smart! Even quicker when we found out it had a non disclosed issue with bolting. Same thing would have happened with a trial. I'm still gutted it wasnt bought so we could have had him PTS and prevented him doing it again!
 
Top