Princess16
Well-Known Member
Aww he's Gawjuss
he's one lucky boy as are you to have him!
you have done him proud He looks very sweet and it is a credit to you your pocket and your experience that has given him a chance. For one I am not keen on people rescuing as it leads to so much misery for so many but I do congratulate you on doing a good job on him.
Why do you say that? If people like OP didn't rescue these poor horses what would happen to them? Not sure what you mean?
It fuels the cycle. Every time someone pays to "rescue" a horse, all that's happening is the people who are breeding all these "unwanted" horses and ponies get the message that the demand is there. Where Jo Public gives a demand for something, others will fill that demand.
In short...if people stop "rescuing" these horses, their production will slow down. It'll probably never stop, but the hype and the drama around headlines on social media and the like saying that horses need to go due to loss of grazing/will go to the meatman ect. are almost all a ploy. It's a well oiled sales tactic and nobody is rescuing anything per say...just buying a very low cost horse.
If people want to rescue horses, go to the charities and re-home one. That's how to help the welfare crisis. Buying horses like this is actually making the whole welfare crisis worse. Yes, people like the OP are making the life of that one horse or two better, but by doing so, are creating more and more lives for more and more horses that may well not be so lucky. Why? Because people like the OP know what to do with a £50 horse. Many people who pay that for a horse don't have a clue or worse...buy them, rush them, sell them in to the dealers cycle or, get bored, "rescue" too many etc. and end up neglecting them through lack of care or resources.
I don't condemn people like the OP and this isn't an attack on her. However, to answer your question, if the OP didn't "rescue" these poor horses, they would end up with the meat man...given a very swift end to life and the majority of them (because not all sold will go to good homes like the OP's) from a very uncertain and often bl00dy awful future. On top of that, if people like the OP didn't buy them, the demand would decrease and in line, so would the production.
Stop adding fuel to a fire and it will eventually burn out. Every time a well meaning person buys a horse like this, it's adding fuel to the fire of the welfare crisis...making things worse for other horses, not better.
Explained perfectly thanks. And yes put like that totally agree with you. I was seeing it as just giving a poor horse a good home and brighter future sop that I am��
It fuels the cycle. Every time someone pays to "rescue" a horse, all that's happening is the people who are breeding all these "unwanted" horses and ponies get the message that the demand is there. Where Jo Public gives a demand for something, others will fill that demand.
In short...if people stop "rescuing" these horses, their production will slow down.
It's good to be a sop and I hate myself when I type out things like that because the vast majority of people who buy these horses only mean to do good and I would never want to criticise that. I just wish there was more education available to make sure everybody knows the realities and not just those of us who have seen it directly. xx
It's good to be a sop and I hate myself when I type out things like that because the vast majority of people who buy these horses only mean to do good and I would never want to criticise that. I just wish there was more education available to make sure everybody knows the realities and not just those of us who have seen it directly. xx
Are you planning on keeping both usernames now then OP? I can't keep up!
Err seriously?!!!!!
I think everyone who worked it out has been quite generous to allow you carry on as your new user name despite your blatant lieing in your initial post about how you had heard all about this forum, were new etc etc but posting as both people on the same thread. Nah, not on.
Sorry!
Fides and EQUIDAE are the same person.
We have known this since EQUIDAE posted pictures on her first post/thread but when it was brought up despite her initial post claiming 'first post so please be gentle with me'. She pm'd a number of people stating stalker etc reasons for needing to stay under the radar so continued to post as EQUIDAE (and has done on this thread :rolleyes3:' Apparently it is all ok now though and one of the key rules is no multiple user names and it is deceiving people.
https://forums-secure.horseandhound.co.uk/showthread.php?707413-Aggressive-Youngster
Think the clues were there when underneath her name it says 1440 posts !!Sorry!
Fides and EQUIDAE are the same person.
We have known this since EQUIDAE posted pictures on her first post/thread but when it was brought up despite her initial post claiming 'first post so please be gentle with me'. She pm'd a number of people stating stalker etc reasons for needing to stay under the radar so continued to post as EQUIDAE (and has done on this thread :rolleyes3:' Apparently it is all ok now though and one of the key rules is no multiple user names and it is deceiving people.
https://forums-secure.horseandhound.co.uk/showthread.php?707413-Aggressive-Youngster
It has been reported to admin now, I doubt that she is the only one with two log-ins either but if you want to do that it is usually wise not to add a load of photos to your first post that people will recognise :rolleyes3:
It wasn't previously reported as the poster wasn't active as Fides and had reasons not to post under that name. I don't think it is unreasonable to expect people to pick one username and stick with it for general posting.
Sorry I don't understand princess16? It was known from her first post as Equidae that she was in fact Fides.
I happened to be on line at the time and saw the original post from EQUIDAE when it came up, it was something along the lines of 'Why do you keep going on about it?'. I thought 'That's let the cat out of the bag!'.Oh I didn't see an edit?
Yes it would certainly make sense to see if admin can amalgamate them.
I'm not sure this is actually the case here. From what OP has said it sounds like this is an outfit similar to several around here, basically they are breeding and selling mares for a reasonably amount of money. They can't be bothered with the colts as they will need to be gelded, will need time to recover, and aren't worth as much. So the colts go for meat, or they find another sales tactic with the "rescue" wheeze. Whether the colts for for meat or they make a little more selling them to someone else doesn't really make any difference to them, they are a byproduct. Unless you could make the breeding of the mares not worthwhile (and they sell them within their community mostly so the only way would be to signicantly increase the cost of breeding and selling them in some way that they can't avoid paying) then the colts will always be born and will always be got rid of somehow.
The whole point of the thread was not to encourage people but to put them off - giving the true cost of the cheap £50 horse. Also the hard work and time involved in getting them to a stage where they are 'useful'. Nearly £1200 and not even backed yet...
Yes, see the link here http://www.tradingstandards.gov.uk/cgi-bin/glos/bus1item.cgi?file=*BADV624-1001.txt 'Can I keep a horse without a passport' section. I used to work in a vets and there would be some very big apparently 6 month old foals when it came to passporting! I assume it is for the drugs front I don't know what would happen if a foal received bute before passporting, I suppose honesty would be expected when it came to getting passport. In cattle it is 27 days after birth (but it is expected for them to go into food I suppose) if they are not done by then then they cannot either(go into food) So in theory if these were over 6 month and not passported they are rather stuck! £50 is in fact a good price when the other alternative would be to get the knackerman out to dispose of them.
Sorry to go off topic, he looks lovely and I hope you do well with him. Just interesting sometimes for legal implications. They could also get done for not passporting (in theory) I don't know if there has been any histroy of his actually happening?